Editing spell-check lexicon

[msnews.microsoft.com]

How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from the
spell-check?

The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors because
the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon and
isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for' which I
often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't flagged as
a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would be much
better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of the word
'for' would show as a mistake.

JF.

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from the
> spell-check?
>
> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors
because
> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon and
> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for' which I
> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't flagged
as
> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would be
much
> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of the word
> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>
> JF.
>
>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

Thanks Suzanne.

That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and it
didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot on!

JF.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
...
> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>
> --
> Suzanne S. Barnhill
> Microsoft MVP (Word)
> Words into Type
> Fairhope, Alabama USA
> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup
> so
> all may benefit.
>
> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> ...
>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from the
>> spell-check?
>>
>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors
> because
>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon and
>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for' which I
>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't flagged
> as
>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would be
> much
>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of the
>> word
>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>
>> JF.
>>
>>
>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker as an
email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.

I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?

How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?

JF.

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> Thanks Suzanne.
>
> That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and it
> didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot on!
>
> JF.
>
> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
> ...
>> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>
>> --
>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> Words into Type
>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup
>> so
>> all may benefit.
>>
>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from the
>>> spell-check?
>>>
>>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors
>> because
>>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon and
>>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for' which I
>>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't flagged
>> as
>>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would be
>> much
>>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of the
>>> word
>>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>>
>>> JF.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell checker
in emails, so I wouldn't know.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker as
an
> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>
> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>
> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>
> JF.
>
> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Thanks Suzanne.
> >
> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and it
> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot on!
> >
> > JF.
> >
> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
> >>
> >> --
> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
> >> Words into Type
> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
newsgroup
> >> so
> >> all may benefit.
> >>
> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from
the
> >>> spell-check?
> >>>
> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors
> >> because
> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon
and
> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for' which
I
> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
flagged
> >> as
> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would
be
> >> much
> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of the
> >>> word
> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
> >>>
> >>> JF.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

Thanks Suzanne.

I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that Word
can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the same way
Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many mistakes it's
difficult to see why this isn't on by default or, indeed, why anybody would
want to disable it.

What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work, but I
can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more likely
that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most people just put up
with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there anything I can do to get
that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix scheduled for some
attention?

JF.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
...
> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
> checker
> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>
> --
> Suzanne S. Barnhill
> Microsoft MVP (Word)
> Words into Type
> Fairhope, Alabama USA
> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup
> so
> all may benefit.
>
> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> ...
>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker as
> an
>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>
>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>
>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>
>> JF.
>>
>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>> >
>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and
>> > it
>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot on!
>> >
>> > JF.
>> >
>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> >> Words into Type
>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
> newsgroup
>> >> so
>> >> all may benefit.
>> >>
>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from
> the
>> >>> spell-check?
>> >>>
>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors
>> >> because
>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon
> and
>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
>> >>> which
> I
>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
> flagged
>> >> as
>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would
> be
>> >> much
>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of the
>> >>> word
>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>> >>>
>> >>> JF.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

I can ask about it.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> Thanks Suzanne.
>
> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that Word
> can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the same way
> Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many mistakes it's
> difficult to see why this isn't on by default or, indeed, why anybody
would
> want to disable it.
>
> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work, but I
> can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more likely
> that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most people just put
up
> with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there anything I can do to
get
> that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix scheduled for some
> attention?
>
> JF.
>
> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
> ...
> > It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
> > Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
> > checker
> > in emails, so I wouldn't know.
> >
> > --
> > Suzanne S. Barnhill
> > Microsoft MVP (Word)
> > Words into Type
> > Fairhope, Alabama USA
> > Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
> > Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
newsgroup
> > so
> > all may benefit.
> >
> > "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker
as
> > an
> >> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
> >>
> >> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
> >>
> >> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
> >>
> >> JF.
> >>
> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > Thanks Suzanne.
> >> >
> >> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and
> >> > it
> >> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot
on!
> >> >
> >> > JF.
> >> >
> >> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
> >> > ...
> >> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
> >> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
> >> >> Words into Type
> >> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
> >> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
> >> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
> > newsgroup
> >> >> so
> >> >> all may benefit.
> >> >>
> >> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from
> > the
> >> >>> spell-check?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as
errors
> >> >> because
> >> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon
> > and
> >> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
> >> >>> which
> > I
> >> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
> > flagged
> >> >> as
> >> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it
would
> > be
> >> >> much
> >> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of
the
> >> >>> word
> >> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> JF.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

[Beth Melton]

What version of Word and Outlook are you using? Are you using mixed
versions? For example Word 2003 and Outlook 2007?

Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton
Microsoft Office MVP

Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook

Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> Thanks Suzanne.
>
> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that Word
> can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the same way
> Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many mistakes it's
> difficult to see why this isn't on by default or, indeed, why anybody
> would want to disable it.
>
> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work, but I
> can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more likely
> that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most people just put
> up with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there anything I can do
> to get that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix scheduled
> for some attention?
>
> JF.
>
> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
> ...
>> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
>> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
>> checker
>> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>>
>> --
>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> Words into Type
>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup
>> so
>> all may benefit.
>>
>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker
>>> as
>> an
>>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>>
>>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>>
>>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>>
>>> JF.
>>>
>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>>> >
>>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and
>>> > it
>>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot
>>> > on!
>>> >
>>> > JF.
>>> >
>>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>> > ...
>>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>> >> Words into Type
>>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>> newsgroup
>>> >> so
>>> >> all may benefit.
>>> >>
>>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>> >> ...
>>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from
>> the
>>> >>> spell-check?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as errors
>>> >> because
>>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon
>> and
>>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
>>> >>> which
>> I
>>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
>> flagged
>>> >> as
>>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it would
>> be
>>> >> much
>>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> word
>>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> JF.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

Thanks Beth.

Both are from the Office 2007 CD (supplied in MS Action Pack).

Our server is running SBS 2003 R2 and Exchange server 2003, so the client
PCs had to be added to the domain. I understand that some changes are made
to the client PCs, including some changes to the Outlook clients, but I
can't see that this should affect the spell-check in any way.

Am I right in assuming that all Office apps should share the spell-checking
engine and thereby share the exclusion dictionary that is the subject of
this post?

JF.

"Beth Melton" > wrote in message
...
> What version of Word and Outlook are you using? Are you using mixed
> versions? For example Word 2003 and Outlook 2007?
>
> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Beth Melton
> Microsoft Office MVP
>
> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>
> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>
> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Thanks Suzanne.
>>
>> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that
>> Word can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the
>> same way Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many
>> mistakes it's difficult to see why this isn't on by default or, indeed,
>> why anybody would want to disable it.
>>
>> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work, but I
>> can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more likely
>> that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most people just put
>> up with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there anything I can do
>> to get that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix scheduled
>> for some attention?
>>
>> JF.
>>
>> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
>>> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
>>> checker
>>> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>> Words into Type
>>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>> newsgroup so
>>> all may benefit.
>>>
>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker
>>>> as
>>> an
>>>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>>>
>>>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>>>
>>>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>>>
>>>> JF.
>>>>
>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>>>> >
>>>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation and
>>>> > it
>>>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot
>>>> > on!
>>>> >
>>>> > JF.
>>>> >
>>>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>> > ...
>>>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>> >> Words into Type
>>>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>> newsgroup
>>>> >> so
>>>> >> all may benefit.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>> >> ...
>>>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words from
>>> the
>>>> >>> spell-check?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as
>>>> >>> errors
>>>> >> because
>>>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the lexicon
>>> and
>>>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
>>>> >>> which
>>> I
>>>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
>>> flagged
>>>> >> as
>>>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it
>>>> >>> would
>>> be
>>>> >> much
>>>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >>> word
>>>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> JF.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Beth Melton]

Since you are using Office 2007, what did you name the exclusion dictionary
and where is it placed?

You are correct, Office apps should share spell check features and I can use
my exclusion dictionary in Word, Outlook, PPT, Excel. (I didn't verify
Access when this came up.) So if you can't use it then something isn't
right.

Although....Exchange Server 2003 could have something to do with it. I've
heard about a few strange bugs for those using Exchange 2003 and Outlook
2007.

Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton
Microsoft Office MVP

Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook

Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> Thanks Beth.
>
> Both are from the Office 2007 CD (supplied in MS Action Pack).
>
> Our server is running SBS 2003 R2 and Exchange server 2003, so the client
> PCs had to be added to the domain. I understand that some changes are
> made to the client PCs, including some changes to the Outlook clients, but
> I can't see that this should affect the spell-check in any way.
>
> Am I right in assuming that all Office apps should share the
> spell-checking engine and thereby share the exclusion dictionary that is
> the subject of this post?
>
> JF.
>
> "Beth Melton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> What version of Word and Outlook are you using? Are you using mixed
>> versions? For example Word 2003 and Outlook 2007?
>>
>> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
>> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Beth Melton
>> Microsoft Office MVP
>>
>> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>>
>> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
>> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
>> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>>
>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Thanks Suzanne.
>>>
>>> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that
>>> Word can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the
>>> same way Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many
>>> mistakes it's difficult to see why this isn't on by default or, indeed,
>>> why anybody would want to disable it.
>>>
>>> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work, but
>>> I can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more
>>> likely that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most people
>>> just put up with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there anything
>>> I can do to get that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix
>>> scheduled for some attention?
>>>
>>> JF.
>>>
>>> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
>>>> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
>>>> checker
>>>> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>> Words into Type
>>>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>> newsgroup so
>>>> all may benefit.
>>>>
>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word spellchecker
>>>>> as
>>>> an
>>>>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>>>>
>>>>> JF.
>>>>>
>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation
>>>>> > and it
>>>>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot
>>>>> > on!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > JF.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>>> > ...
>>>>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>> >> Words into Type
>>>>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>> newsgroup
>>>>> >> so
>>>>> >> all may benefit.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>> >> ...
>>>>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words
>>>>> >>> from
>>>> the
>>>>> >>> spell-check?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as
>>>>> >>> errors
>>>>> >> because
>>>>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the
>>>>> >>> lexicon
>>>> and
>>>>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
>>>>> >>> which
>>>> I
>>>>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
>>>> flagged
>>>>> >> as
>>>>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it
>>>>> >>> would
>>>> be
>>>>> >> much
>>>>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of
>>>>> >>> the
>>>>> >>> word
>>>>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> JF.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

Sorry Beth, I'm using 2003 not 2007 (got confused coz I have 2007 at home).

My exclusion dictionary is named MSSP3EN.EXC and located in:

C:\Documents and Settings\JonathanFinney\Application Data\Microsoft\Proof

Does this make any difference?

My test (and currently the only entry in the exclusion dictionary) is the
word 'fro' that I frequently mistype in place of 'for'. Although 'fro' is a
real (if somewhat arcane) word, I'm unlikely to use it so I found out about
the exclusion dictionary.

I just tested it in the OE Newsreader I'm using and it doesn't work here
either.

I'd like to get it fixed though!

JF.

"Beth Melton" > wrote in message
...
> Since you are using Office 2007, what did you name the exclusion
> dictionary
> and where is it placed?
>
> You are correct, Office apps should share spell check features and I can
> use
> my exclusion dictionary in Word, Outlook, PPT, Excel. (I didn't verify
> Access when this came up.) So if you can't use it then something isn't
> right.
>
> Although....Exchange Server 2003 could have something to do with it. I've
> heard about a few strange bugs for those using Exchange 2003 and Outlook
> 2007.
>
> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Beth Melton
> Microsoft Office MVP
>
> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>
> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>
> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Thanks Beth.
>>
>> Both are from the Office 2007 CD (supplied in MS Action Pack).
>>
>> Our server is running SBS 2003 R2 and Exchange server 2003, so the client
>> PCs had to be added to the domain. I understand that some changes are
>> made to the client PCs, including some changes to the Outlook clients,
>> but
>> I can't see that this should affect the spell-check in any way.
>>
>> Am I right in assuming that all Office apps should share the
>> spell-checking engine and thereby share the exclusion dictionary that is
>> the subject of this post?
>>
>> JF.
>>
>> "Beth Melton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> What version of Word and Outlook are you using? Are you using mixed
>>> versions? For example Word 2003 and Outlook 2007?
>>>
>>> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
>>> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Beth Melton
>>> Microsoft Office MVP
>>>
>>> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>>>
>>> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
>>> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
>>> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>>>
>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>
>>>> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that
>>>> Word can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the
>>>> same way Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many
>>>> mistakes it's difficult to see why this isn't on by default or, indeed,
>>>> why anybody would want to disable it.
>>>>
>>>> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work, but
>>>> I can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more
>>>> likely that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most people
>>>> just put up with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there
>>>> anything
>>>> I can do to get that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix
>>>> scheduled for some attention?
>>>>
>>>> JF.
>>>>
>>>> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
>>>>> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
>>>>> checker
>>>>> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>> Words into Type
>>>>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>>> newsgroup so
>>>>> all may benefit.
>>>>>
>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word
>>>>>> spellchecker
>>>>>> as
>>>>> an
>>>>>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation
>>>>>> > and it
>>>>>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's spot
>>>>>> > on!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > JF.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>>>> > ...
>>>>>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>>> >> Words into Type
>>>>>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>>> newsgroup
>>>>>> >> so
>>>>>> >> all may benefit.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>> >> ...
>>>>>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words
>>>>>> >>> from
>>>>> the
>>>>>> >>> spell-check?
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as
>>>>>> >>> errors
>>>>>> >> because
>>>>>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the
>>>>>> >>> lexicon
>>>>> and
>>>>>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
>>>>>> >>> which
>>>>> I
>>>>>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
>>>>> flagged
>>>>>> >> as
>>>>>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it
>>>>>> >>> would
>>>>> be
>>>>>> >> much
>>>>>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping of
>>>>>> >>> the
>>>>>> >>> word
>>>>>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> JF.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

[Beth Melton]

I can't confirm Office 2003 since I'm using Office 2007. Perhaps someone
else can?

Now, if you are using Outlook Express then I doubt it will recognize the
exclusion dictionary. Even though it's named 'Outlook' it's not Office
related.

Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton
Microsoft Office MVP

Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook

Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/

"msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
...
> Sorry Beth, I'm using 2003 not 2007 (got confused coz I have 2007 at
> home).
>
> My exclusion dictionary is named MSSP3EN.EXC and located in:
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\JonathanFinney\Application Data\Microsoft\Proof
>
> Does this make any difference?
>
> My test (and currently the only entry in the exclusion dictionary) is the
> word 'fro' that I frequently mistype in place of 'for'. Although 'fro' is
> a real (if somewhat arcane) word, I'm unlikely to use it so I found out
> about the exclusion dictionary.
>
> I just tested it in the OE Newsreader I'm using and it doesn't work here
> either.
>
> I'd like to get it fixed though!
>
> JF.
>
> "Beth Melton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Since you are using Office 2007, what did you name the exclusion
>> dictionary
>> and where is it placed?
>>
>> You are correct, Office apps should share spell check features and I can
>> use
>> my exclusion dictionary in Word, Outlook, PPT, Excel. (I didn't verify
>> Access when this came up.) So if you can't use it then something isn't
>> right.
>>
>> Although....Exchange Server 2003 could have something to do with it. I've
>> heard about a few strange bugs for those using Exchange 2003 and Outlook
>> 2007.
>>
>> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
>> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Beth Melton
>> Microsoft Office MVP
>>
>> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>>
>> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
>> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
>> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>>
>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Thanks Beth.
>>>
>>> Both are from the Office 2007 CD (supplied in MS Action Pack).
>>>
>>> Our server is running SBS 2003 R2 and Exchange server 2003, so the
>>> client
>>> PCs had to be added to the domain. I understand that some changes are
>>> made to the client PCs, including some changes to the Outlook clients,
>>> but
>>> I can't see that this should affect the spell-check in any way.
>>>
>>> Am I right in assuming that all Office apps should share the
>>> spell-checking engine and thereby share the exclusion dictionary that is
>>> the subject of this post?
>>>
>>> JF.
>>>
>>> "Beth Melton" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> What version of Word and Outlook are you using? Are you using mixed
>>>> versions? For example Word 2003 and Outlook 2007?
>>>>
>>>> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
>>>> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>>>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Beth Melton
>>>> Microsoft Office MVP
>>>>
>>>> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>>>>
>>>> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
>>>> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
>>>> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>>>>
>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that
>>>>> Word can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the
>>>>> same way Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many
>>>>> mistakes it's difficult to see why this isn't on by default or,
>>>>> indeed,
>>>>> why anybody would want to disable it.
>>>>>
>>>>> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work,
>>>>> but
>>>>> I can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more
>>>>> likely that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most
>>>>> people
>>>>> just put up with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there
>>>>> anything
>>>>> I can do to get that might help to highlight the problem and get a fix
>>>>> scheduled for some attention?
>>>>>
>>>>> JF.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and perhaps
>>>>>> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
>>>>>> checker
>>>>>> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>>> Words into Type
>>>>>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>>>> newsgroup so
>>>>>> all may benefit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word
>>>>>>> spellchecker
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation
>>>>>>> > and it
>>>>>>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's
>>>>>>> > spot
>>>>>>> > on!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > JF.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> > ...
>>>>>>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>>>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>>>> >> Words into Type
>>>>>>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>>>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>>>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>>>> newsgroup
>>>>>>> >> so
>>>>>>> >> all may benefit.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> >> ...
>>>>>>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words
>>>>>>> >>> from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> >>> spell-check?
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as
>>>>>>> >>> errors
>>>>>>> >> because
>>>>>>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the
>>>>>>> >>> lexicon
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word 'for'
>>>>>>> >>> which
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it isn't
>>>>>> flagged
>>>>>>> >> as
>>>>>>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it
>>>>>>> >>> would
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> >> much
>>>>>>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping
>>>>>>> >>> of
>>>>>>> >>> the
>>>>>>> >>> word
>>>>>>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> JF.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

I stopped using OE years ago. Despite having some features that I miss, it
simply isn't powerful enough to do the jobs handled by Outlook.

I use Outlook Newsreader which I understand is OE with a different skin, so
that may explain why it exhibits the fault, but I'd like to get to the
bottom of this and get it fixed if possible, so any help you can give by
passing it on to someone who may be able to help will be much appreciated.

It's likely we'll be migrating to Office 2007 this year, but Outlook is one
app that hasn't benefitted as much as the others from the new interface
developments which is a pity given the vast user base and potential
improvements available to Outlook users. At least you've confirmed that the
spell checking works across all Office products in 2007. It is my opinion
that Microsoft could easily justify allocating a bigger proportion of its
development budget on Outlook. What are your thoughts on this? How do I
make my voice heard on this matter?

I'd also like to know if it's possible to share dictionaries across a
workgroup. Keeping dictionaries synchronised across many PCs is an
administrative task that should be unnecessary in the modern workgroup
scenario.

I'll post a new topic regarding this and would appreciate your input.

JF.

"Beth Melton" > wrote in message
...
>I can't confirm Office 2003 since I'm using Office 2007. Perhaps someone
>else can?
>
> Now, if you are using Outlook Express then I doubt it will recognize the
> exclusion dictionary. Even though it's named 'Outlook' it's not Office
> related.
>
> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Beth Melton
> Microsoft Office MVP
>
> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>
> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>
> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Sorry Beth, I'm using 2003 not 2007 (got confused coz I have 2007 at
>> home).
>>
>> My exclusion dictionary is named MSSP3EN.EXC and located in:
>>
>> C:\Documents and Settings\JonathanFinney\Application Data\Microsoft\Proof
>>
>> Does this make any difference?
>>
>> My test (and currently the only entry in the exclusion dictionary) is the
>> word 'fro' that I frequently mistype in place of 'for'. Although 'fro'
>> is a real (if somewhat arcane) word, I'm unlikely to use it so I found
>> out about the exclusion dictionary.
>>
>> I just tested it in the OE Newsreader I'm using and it doesn't work here
>> either.
>>
>> I'd like to get it fixed though!
>>
>> JF.
>>
>> "Beth Melton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Since you are using Office 2007, what did you name the exclusion
>>> dictionary
>>> and where is it placed?
>>>
>>> You are correct, Office apps should share spell check features and I can
>>> use
>>> my exclusion dictionary in Word, Outlook, PPT, Excel. (I didn't verify
>>> Access when this came up.) So if you can't use it then something isn't
>>> right.
>>>
>>> Although....Exchange Server 2003 could have something to do with it.
>>> I've heard about a few strange bugs for those using Exchange 2003 and
>>> Outlook 2007.
>>>
>>> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
>>> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Beth Melton
>>> Microsoft Office MVP
>>>
>>> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>>>
>>> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
>>> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
>>> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>>>
>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Thanks Beth.
>>>>
>>>> Both are from the Office 2007 CD (supplied in MS Action Pack).
>>>>
>>>> Our server is running SBS 2003 R2 and Exchange server 2003, so the
>>>> client
>>>> PCs had to be added to the domain. I understand that some changes are
>>>> made to the client PCs, including some changes to the Outlook clients,
>>>> but
>>>> I can't see that this should affect the spell-check in any way.
>>>>
>>>> Am I right in assuming that all Office apps should share the
>>>> spell-checking engine and thereby share the exclusion dictionary that
>>>> is
>>>> the subject of this post?
>>>>
>>>> JF.
>>>>
>>>> "Beth Melton" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> What version of Word and Outlook are you using? Are you using mixed
>>>>> versions? For example Word 2003 and Outlook 2007?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
>>>>> assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> Beth Melton
>>>>> Microsoft Office MVP
>>>>>
>>>>> Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9801.aspx#AboutTheBook
>>>>>
>>>>> Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
>>>>> TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
>>>>> MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do use the spellchecker for emails. In fact it's a great pity that
>>>>>> Word can't invoke this automatically when a document is closed in the
>>>>>> same way Outlook does when a message is sent. It's saved me so many
>>>>>> mistakes it's difficult to see why this isn't on by default or,
>>>>>> indeed,
>>>>>> why anybody would want to disable it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What you've suggested is a fair explanation of why it doesn't work,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> I can't help but think that such behaviour is by design. Much more
>>>>>> likely that it's been overlooked and remains broken because most
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> just put up with it and haven't bothered to complain. Is there
>>>>>> anything
>>>>>> I can do to get that might help to highlight the problem and get a
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> scheduled for some attention?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> It would appear that perhaps they share the same lexicon (and
>>>>>>> perhaps
>>>>>>> Custom.dic) but not the exclusion dictionary? I don't use the spell
>>>>>>> checker
>>>>>>> in emails, so I wouldn't know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>>>> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>>>> Words into Type
>>>>>>> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>>>> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>>>> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>>>>> newsgroup so
>>>>>>> all may benefit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> I just noticed that this only appears to work on the Word
>>>>>>>> spellchecker
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> email I just sent had the 'fro' mistake in it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I thought all Office products shared the spellchecker?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How can I achieve that same thing for spellchecking in Outlook?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> JF.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> > Thanks Suzanne.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > That's just what I wanted. I did this on a previous installation
>>>>>>>> > and it
>>>>>>>> > didn't work (probably did something wrong), but this time it's
>>>>>>>> > spot
>>>>>>>> > on!
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > JF.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > "Suzanne S. Barnhill" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> > ...
>>>>>>>> >> See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/General/ExcludeWordFromDic.htm
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>>> >> Suzanne S. Barnhill
>>>>>>>> >> Microsoft MVP (Word)
>>>>>>>> >> Words into Type
>>>>>>>> >> Fairhope, Alabama USA
>>>>>>>> >> Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
>>>>>>>> >> Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
>>>>>>> newsgroup
>>>>>>>> >> so
>>>>>>>> >> all may benefit.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> "msnews.microsoft.com" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> >> ...
>>>>>>>> >>> How do I edit the spell-check lexicon to exclude certain words
>>>>>>>> >>> from
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> >>> spell-check?
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> The reason for this is that certain errors are not flagged as
>>>>>>>> >>> errors
>>>>>>>> >> because
>>>>>>>> >>> the mis-spelled word is a valid word that's included in the
>>>>>>>> >>> lexicon
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> >>> isn't flagged as an error. An example of this is the word
>>>>>>>> >>> 'for'
>>>>>>>> >>> which
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> >>> often mis-type as 'fro'. Because 'fro' is a valid word it
>>>>>>>> >>> isn't
>>>>>>> flagged
>>>>>>>> >> as
>>>>>>>> >>> a mistake. However it's a word I'd rarely use, if ever and it
>>>>>>>> >>> would
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> >> much
>>>>>>>> >>> better if I could remove this from the lexicon so my mistyping
>>>>>>>> >>> of
>>>>>>>> >>> the
>>>>>>>> >>> word
>>>>>>>> >>> 'for' would show as a mistake.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> JF.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Graham Mayor]

msnews.microsoft.com wrote:
> It's likely we'll be migrating to Office 2007 this year, but Outlook
> is one app that hasn't benefitted as much as the others from the new
> interface developments which is a pity given the vast user base and
> potential improvements available to Outlook users.

Frankly I personally think that the new additions to Outlook have improved
it a great deal. It is now easier to use and doesn't require the huge
re-learning curve introduced by the ribbon system. I for one hope that
unneccesary 'improvements' are avoided :)

--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

[msnews.microsoft.com]

Thanks Ed. but the post is actually about the spell-checking system and the
fact that I can't get the exclusion dictionary to work when sending an email
in Outlook (not using Word as my email editor).

In future I'll be more careful hewn I drift into a general rant as it
obviously distracts from the original point of the post.

I'd like to give more details of why I made the comments about Outlook
development, but it's outside the scope of this thread.

Any ideas who might be able to help with the spell-check problem?

JF.

"Graham Mayor" > wrote in message
...
> msnews.microsoft.com wrote:
>> It's likely we'll be migrating to Office 2007 this year, but Outlook
>> is one app that hasn't benefitted as much as the others from the new
>> interface developments which is a pity given the vast user base and
>> potential improvements available to Outlook users.
>
> Frankly I personally think that the new additions to Outlook have improved
> it a great deal. It is now easier to use and doesn't require the huge
> re-learning curve introduced by the ribbon system. I for one hope that
> unneccesary 'improvements' are avoided :)
>
> --
> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Graham Mayor - Word MVP
>
> My web site www.gmayor.com
> Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>