Well, yes and no. One can be cheap and easy just once. If promiscuous,
cheapness/expense and ease/difficulty are irrelevant-just frequency and
lack of emotional commitment.

Tom
MSMVP

"Mike Hall (MS-MVP)" wrote in message
...
: Tom
:
: Is that the technical way of saying 'cheap and easy'?
:
: --
: Mike Hall
: MVP - Windows Shell/User
:
:
: "Tom Ferguson" wrote in message
: ...
: In biology, promiscuity is a mating system within which no pair bond
is
: formed. In other intellectual disciplines such as sociology or social
: psychology, the term has other meanings. In "common use", the term
refers
: to having many sexual partners.
:
: "That is the conduct I would always prescribe to all women who would
: follow in my steps. In the twelve years I have been married I have
been
: had by perhaps ten or twelve thousand individuals." (Madame de
Saint-Ange
: as Quoted in J. Atkins' "Sex in Literature".)
:
:
: Try Google. Anything else?
:
: Tom
: MSMVP
: Windows Shell/User
:
: "baby_d_119" wrote in message
: ...
: : can any 1 tell me what this is because i need 5 pages on this
topic
: before
: : tuesday 1st november. if you can get this for me thank you.
:
:
:
: