Well, to get the link, I had to go to Bob Buckland's message.
The "essay" contains a great deal of blather. I gather "orkut" is an
Indian ISP?
You seem to have two points. (1) Transliteration is not necessary.
(2) Windows cannot properly handle Indian scripts.
(1) is a matter of opinion and is correct in some circumstances,
incorrect in others.
(2), as I and others told you more than half a year ago, is simply
incorrect. Every version of Windows since I-don't-know-when has
provided full support for typing in the 11 standard scripts of India
(roman, Nagari, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Bengali, Oriya, Kannada, Telugu,
Tamil, Malayalam, Urdu), with a dedicated keyboard for each. All of
them have been included in Unicode since Version 1.0 nearly 20 years
ago.
On Sep 14, 5:09*am, Ashok Kothare
wrote:
I am very sorry that the page on my blog was written next day due to internet
problem at my end. Now you can read my article on the page Transliteration
and please write back for your comments here and also if possible on the
comment box of the blog. That page shall remain on the blog for some time
now, for all interested observers. Friend Grammtin, please note.
"Bob * Buckland ?:-)" wrote:
Hi Ashok,
Can you provide the link to the specific document you're referring to in your post? *The Transliteration article on your blog at
*http://kothareashok.blog.co.in/transliteration/
basically says 'coming soon'. 
==============
* "Ashok Kothare" Ashok wrote in message
...
Friends, I am resuming the dialogue after about seven months. Somebody told
me that transliteration is the answer to the problem of Indian language
inclusion as default font. I have studied the suggestion and come with reply.
that reply is in details and so I have put it on my blog. Please visit my
blog to read it. It is a research paper too lengthy for this box. URL of my
blog
http://kothareashok.blog.co.in
and you may reply to it on this site as well as on the comment box. *