[Ashok Kothare[_2_]]

As I had said in my last mail I have loaded a page on my blog. the page is
"Grammatim". Please log on the blog and read the page. Also ask other
interested in the topic to read it. My blog,
http://kothareashok.blog.co.in
Ashok Kothare


"grammatim" wrote:

On Sep 16, 8:03 am, Ashok Kothare
wrote:
Dear Grammatim, you are very sure that everything has been done to make
windows suitable to write in Indian languages.

"Everything"? I have no idea what "everything" might be. You can type
in the 11 standard Indian scripts without adding anything at all to
Windows out-of-the-box. Conjuncts are formed, and matras are placed,
automatically as you type the sounds of the letters in the order they
are spoken -- you don't even need to type i before the consonant, or
o both before and after (Bengali). Once you have selected the (or a)
keyboard for your language, you begin to get characters in that
script, in whatever the system's default might be. For some it's Arial
Unicode, for some it's Sylfaen, for some (Urdu, Sindhi), it's Times
New Roman.

I am afraid you are not
correct. Another point you have put is that unicode has been finalized for
Indian languages is also not correct. If you see unicodes used by fonts such
as 'mangal' you will see that they are not placed on the unicodes
recommended for Indian languages but they are put on other nondescript
unicode places.

It is hardly Unicode's fault that some font designers have failed to
adhere to Unicode standards. I have not heard of "mangal"; for what
script is it a font?

If windows do that how that can be justified? I want

"Windows" do not "do that." Font designers do that. Maybe "mangal" is
20 years old and was made before computers could handle more than 128
or 256 characters.

Microsoft to be a perfect instrument to get proper unicodes to be used for
these languages. I will add one more page to my blog soon to show you the
difference in what unicodes are used by microsoft Indian fonts and what are
the actuall unicodes offered by the unicode. I want to know why microsoft is
doing this? Is it justified to put fonts of a langauge on wrong unicodes? My

Certainly not.

intentions are that let us do something that is, in given times, helpful to
users in India. Please do not misunderstand me. I want to know what Bob has
to say. Please visit my blog after 8 days to avoid any misunderstanding. I

Post the link here next week.

have internet server problem here and that makes it difficult to do posting
in time sorry for that. Remember, we Indians wish to use english version of
windows and want to write our messages in Indian languages since that is most
convenient at this time. We often toggle between both languages and for that
english version is most suitable. with regards.

I of course use English version of Windows, and I have no trouble
typing in any of the Indian languages. I can toggle between English
and any of the languages either by choosing them from the Language
Bar, or by pressing LeftAlt+Shift, or by assigning a specific shortcut
to each keyboard (though because I use many, many different scripts in
my work, I have different selections of keyboards installed at
different times, so I don't bother with specific shortcuts except for
getting back to English.)

"grammatim" wrote:
Well, to get the link, I had to go to Bob Buckland's message.

The "essay" contains a great deal of blather. I gather "orkut" is an
Indian ISP?

You seem to have two points. (1) Transliteration is not necessary.

(2) Windows cannot properly handle Indian scripts.

(1) is a matter of opinion and is correct in some circumstances,
incorrect in others.

(2), as I and others told you more than half a year ago, is simply
incorrect. Every version of Windows since I-don't-know-when has
provided full support for typing in the 11 standard scripts of India
(roman, Nagari, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Bengali, Oriya, Kannada, Telugu,
Tamil, Malayalam, Urdu), with a dedicated keyboard for each. All of
them have been included in Unicode since Version 1.0 nearly 20 years
ago.

On Sep 14, 5:09 am, Ashok Kothare
wrote:
I am very sorry that the page on my blog was written next day due to internet
problem at my end. Now you can read my article on the page Transliteration
and please write back for your comments here and also if possible on the
comment box of the blog. That page shall remain on the blog for some time
now, for all interested observers. Friend Grammtin, please note.

"Bob Buckland ?:-)" wrote:

Hi Ashok,

Can you provide the link to the specific document you're referring to in your post? The Transliteration article on your blog at
http://kothareashok.blog.co.in/transliteration/
basically says 'coming soon'.

==============
"Ashok Kothare" Ashok wrote in message
...
Friends, I am resuming the dialogue after about seven months. Somebody told
me that transliteration is the answer to the problem of Indian language
inclusion as default font. I have studied the suggestion and come with reply.
that reply is in details and so I have put it on my blog. Please visit my
blog to read it. It is a research paper too lengthy for this box. URL of my
blog
http://kothareashok.blog.co.in
and you may reply to it on this site as well as on the comment box. -