[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

There is a switch available to hide SEQ fields, but that can't be it,
because you would have seen it when displaying field codes. If you
display hidden text in Word, does that reveal something then?

Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP




On 2012-05-30 12:53, Himmelswüst wrote:
'Stefan Blom[_3_ Wrote:
;492529']Did you ever take a look at the field codes?

Another thought: Are you tracking changes perhaps? In that case,
numbering (auto numbering as well as field numbering) may be incorrect
until you accept, or reject, changes.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



The field codes appeared to be okay. All of them are supposed to look
the same, aren't they? In any case, I haven't been able to find any
inconsistencies.

And no, I'm not tracking changes. My suspicion is that a field is
somehow hidden somewhere -- but looking at the field codes didn't help
me find it, nor did I manage to find it by using "go to" and trying to
search for the field code in question.

The whole thing remains a big mystery to me.



[/i][/color]