[Sesquipedalian Sam]

On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:16:11 -0700, win
wrote:

"Keep with next" works perfectly with me.

It works for a specific situation, but has a tendency to come back and
bite you later when you've added or deleted rows elsewhere and now you
don't want those two rows to stay together.

It is *not* a good general solution.

"Sesquipedalian Sam" wrote:

On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:40:06 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill"
wrote:

You can apply "Keep with next" to rows to force them into the second column.

That should work, but it's inconvenient and error-prone and shouldn't
be necessary.

Also, Word may have inserted an empty paragraph between the table and the
Continuous break. This can be deleted.

Nope, no extra paragraph.

I guess it's just another Word buglet. Has the counter exceeded the
capacity of a 4-byte integer field (yet)?