"Peter Jamieson" wrote in message
...
Can you spell this out a bit? I read and re-read, but wasn't sure what
exactly you are seeing. Is the extra row at the very end of the output,
and what exactly does it contain (a duplicate of the last row of labels?)
Yes, certainly. And thanks for the question; it helped to look at this from
a different angles to try to figure out what's wrong.
Admittedly, I've not done many mail merges in Word. All that I used to do
in my years as a word-processor when WP was the standard. I hadn't actually
looked at the data, so hadn't realized that I was just getting one record
repeated over and over g. My extensive WP experience helped out and I
remembered that there, too, we had to put and "End Record" field in. Once I
did that, this Word mail merge worked properly in that way, too.
So here's the problem. 5167 has 4 columns of 20 rows (for a total of 80
labels). The original target label file has the standard 8x20. But the
merged docts all come out at 8x21! I don't know how to fix this.
I just thought of this, here's what in each cell in the original target
label file:
User: USER
UIN: UIN
Country: COUNTRY S/N: SN
Model: Model P/N: PNNext Record
I bet you that this will make much clearer what I'm doing wrong. Each and
every cell has the above coding but I'm not sure if this is completely
right. Perhaps I'm missing something here, too, that is generating labels
with an incorrect # of rows.
In WP, I vaguely remember that the last field on the page needed an extra
code (next record, or end record, or somesuch). Is this the same for
Word?
In Word 2000, the main thing to get right is "no { NEXT } field in the
first label cell on the sheet, one { NEXT } field at the beginning of each
label cell after that", bearing in mind that some cells in some layouts -
such as 5167 - have "spacer" columns of cells that should not have
anything in them.
I might have misunderstood the above paragraph, but when I removed the
"Next Record" (doesn't show up as "{ NEXT }" for me. I'm using an Excel
file that I used to put in the fields, btw), in the first cell, the first 2
cells in the merged label output were repeated. So that's not what you're
referring to, obviously g.
Re the spacer columns, yes. There is nothing in those columns at all and
they remain empty after the merge. So okay there.
Is it possible to tell what I'm doing wrong judging from the coding above??
Thanks.
D
Peter Jamieson
"StargateFanFromWork" wrote in message
...
Okay, however non-intuitive this solution would be, it is doing the job,
thank goodness. I'm still having one problem. I'm getting an extra row
at the bottom of the merged end document. The original target document
has the correct spacing at the bottom, but the merged doct. puts in an
extra row. In WP, I vaguely remember that the last field on the page
needed an extra code (next record, or end record, or somesuch). Is this
the same for Word? Pls advise. D
"Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote in message
...
Leave labels alone and achieve the space that you are after by changing
the formatting of paragraphs - Left and Right Indent, Space Before and
Space After.
--
Hope this helps.
Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.
Doug Robbins - Word MVP
"StargateFanFromWork" wrote in message
...
I absolutely must have cell margins that are at about 0.05" around the
insides of Avery-sized labels #5167. Before changing the margins, the
pages of labels are aligned and positioned correctly. The instant I
change them to 0.05", the rows all become misaligned and a standard
sheet has a row pushed off to the next page. About halfway throught the
first page, the labels contents are printing half off the labels.
The text before and after the merge in no way is too much for each cell
and I made sure that the "automatically resize to fit contents" option
is not selected in the table options of the table properties so I'm at
a loss to figure out what is going on. The labels are not always
printing correctly from sheet to sheet as, I'm sure most with
experience have found, different batches of labels come out slight
differently placed. I've not done much mail merge or label work as was
the case back in my old word-processing days, but at the time I had
working templates with table margins that worked for any label batches
that came along. Through trial and error one eventually finds the
margins that work to the maximums of label production offset and 0.05"
is about the minimum to accommodate these offsets. Certainly, 0.08"
(tEventually a margin is found that accommodates all slight variations
between label stocks. But if I can't change the margins and retain the
integrity of labels, then I'm stuck. Does anyone know what to do in
this situation? I don't know what else to look at. 0.05" is not even
my preference for label margins. In WP days, I'd use the standard WP
size of 0.05" and I used to use 5167 even back then.
Stuck and hoping someone here knows a good solution to this. Thanks!
D