You are right...altho its hard to go back to that technique (jpg attachments)
...isnt HTML, rich email the way the future was supposed to be? What are
people doing that are sending out HTML mail as part of their business
etc..surely they are not tolerating the blurriness. Look fwd to your input
"Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote:
As you have no control over how the recipient is going to view your email,
you would be better advised to send whatever it is as an attachment.
--
Hope this helps.
Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.
Doug Robbins - Word MVP
"Roady [MVP]" t wrote in
message ...
Sounds like you were using Outlook as the e-mail editor then. Outlook 2007
uses a Word stub. Directly pasting images in Word never has been a great
experience for me either. You can control some of it in Word- Options-
Advanced- Web Options- Pictures...
I've crossposted this to related Word newsgroup as they might have better
answers on this case. You can also send feedback to the BETA team by using
the Send a Smile tool;
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
-----
"Jon Battle - Plano TX" wrote
in message ...
The images I paste inline into an email are poor quality - blurry, fuzzy.
Never used to be this way in Outlook 2003. I use SnagIt to capture them at
100% quality. Any help is appreciated. Thx