I've asked myself the same thing. Thankfully, I still have 2003 on my
desktop, but my laptop came with a trial of 2007 and I got addicted to
OneNote, and found a great deal on Office Home & Student. *L* I am an editor
and designer at heart, so the interface reminds me of PageMaker or something
similar, and it has some pretty darn cool features, like the automatic word
count at the bottom.
But so far, every time I have used it, I've had to reload my shared
Normal.dot. It doesn't automatically load when it opens for some reason. :P
Hoping I finally made it stick today.
"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:
May I ask why you upgraded to Word 2007? I would think for your purposes
Word 2003 (or even Word 97) would be quite adequate.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
"Laverne" wrote in message
...
I have decided to try to use the different ways to see which one will solve
my problem. I'm with you Weyana, being an MT means speed is vital. The
BEST
way was the origninal way that prompted me, and I had so many entered.
I'm
just now realizing as I'm working that I really miss a lot of them. I
guess,
though, that it's just a matter of getting used to it. I just wish we
wouldn't keep having to get used to something new -- Microsoft should find
a
way to fix it and bring back the old way and allow it as a FREE download
for
new computers. It never occurred to me that I should have to find out if
such basic things are a part of the new 2007. ARRRGH!
"Weyana" wrote:
I might consider doing that, actually...although typing for a living,
speed
counts--and symbols slow me down because I have to peek, too. But for
a
couple I do have that get messed up when I type something similar, that
would
still be quicker than Ctrl-Z and retyping after I realize what I did.
"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:
If I were not so clumsy typing on the top row (I have to peek), I'd do
that,
too. As it is, I don't really have very many AutoCorrect entries of
that
type any more, and they tend to be assigned for specific projects and
then
(if I remember) deleted. Sometimes I forget and months later run into
an
expansion that completely surprises me!
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
"Graham Mayor" wrote in message
...
Indeed. I always use autocorrect with a prefix such as #, %, or @ to
avoid
accidental triggering - except for correcting words I have a tendency
to
misspell when typing.
--
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote:
But that's not to say that you couldn't save the "sodfarm" AutoText
entry as an AutoCorrect entry with a different name, such as #sdf.
"Weyana" wrote in message
...
Well, for starters, you can use AutoText to insert several
formatted
paragraphs (for example) by typing one word that is an abbreviation
for that
template. If you use AutoCorrect, then you have to hit 'Undo' or
'Alt-Z' if
you need to refer to that template by name without referring to it.
E.g., a doctor I transcribe for can ask me to jot a note on his log
that he
needs to do the 'sodfarm' for Patient X, and then as he's dictating
the report, when he starts that template, I can type "sodfarm" and
hit F3 (or Enter in 2003) to pull up the template. If "sodfarm"
were an AutoCorrect for
this 1/2 page long bit, then I would constantly be having to undo
the
correction in notes he dictates.
As a general rule, I use AutoCorrect for unique acronyms or
capitalization...mris for MRIs; ncs for nerve conduction studies;
clt for cervical, lumbar, and thoracic; cspine for cervical
spine...things that I would never intend to be left as it is.
While
on the other hand, as I said,
I use AutoText for phrases that I may or may not intend to insert
when I type
its trigger.
"Graham Mayor" wrote:
It depends what you mean by 'more powerful'. I can't off-hand
think
of anything that Autotext can hold that Autocorrect cannot.
Suzanne
is correct
in suggesting that you still have to remember the trigger keys,
but
it is not imposible to make logical combinations that are easy
enough to remember,
but if you prefer autotext/quickparts that's fine. There is no
'autocomplete' in Word 2007.
--
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
Weyana wrote:
Precisely. AutoCorrect can only do so much. AutoText can be far
more powerful. As it turns out, I think the F3 thing may prove a
bit easier after all...as AutoText's AutoComplete suggestion
disengages after you type too many characters. With 2007's
QuickParts, it seems you can type more of the prompt instead of
just 6 characters, or whatever.
"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:
But then you have to remember the prompt for the AutoCorrect
entries, which is just as much trouble as remembering the names
of
the AutoText entries!
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
"Graham Mayor" wrote in message
...
You might consider investigating autocorrect instead as this
inserts immediately.
--
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
Weyana wrote:
n/m. Crisis averted. Had a fairly recent backup that I
remembered about, but slapping Word around a bit got it
working
right again anyway. Still...what an inconvenience. I don't
know about you, but I don't actually have the 'titles' of all
my AT's memorized, and have relied on that prompt. I think I
may just switch back to XP for transcription and save the new
developer/"PageMaker" format for fiddle-farting around with in
my spare time. Thank you both again for putting heads together
to
discuss this!