#1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
DeanV DeanV is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Unwanted text in TOC

For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default Unwanted text in TOC

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been opened.
Fix that in the paragraph dialog (I'm using W2007 and don't remember the
W2003 steps anymore). Then resolve not to use the document map (at least
until its successor, the navigation pane come out in W2010).

Pam

DeanV wrote:
For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201003/1

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a5d98d0b07c46@uwe...
The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been opened.
Fix that in the paragraph dialog (I'm using W2007 and don't remember the
W2003 steps anymore). Then resolve not to use the document map (at least
until its successor, the navigation pane come out in W2010).

Pam

DeanV wrote:
For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body
text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201003/1



  #4   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been opened.

[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1

  #5   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default Unwanted text in TOC

And how could I have figured that out? Here are the descriptions from the
field options dialog:

\o Builds a table of content by using outline levels instead of TC entries
\u Builds a table of content by using the applied paragraph outline level

Pam

Pamelia Caswell wrote:
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that

[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1



  #6   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

I agree: those descriptions certainly aren't (sufficiently) clear. To learn
the difference, one has to do some testing.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a60256a8bf261@uwe...
And how could I have figured that out? Here are the descriptions from the
field options dialog:

\o Builds a table of content by using outline levels instead of TC
entries
\u Builds a table of content by using the applied paragraph outline level

Pam

Pamelia Caswell wrote:
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that

[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1





  #7   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

I agree: those descriptions certainly aren't (sufficiently) clear. To learn
the difference, one has to do some testing.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a60256a8bf261@uwe...
And how could I have figured that out? Here are the descriptions from the
field options dialog:

\o Builds a table of content by using outline levels instead of TC
entries
\u Builds a table of content by using the applied paragraph outline level

Pam

Pamelia Caswell wrote:
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that

[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1





  #8   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

[...] I'd still want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.


Pam, note that this is also covered in the linked article.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a6023bf642689@uwe...
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been
opened.

[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1



  #9   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Suzanne S. Barnhill Suzanne S. Barnhill is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33,624
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Since I also build TOCs based on styles and rarely fiddle with outline
levels, I also hadn't figured out this difference, but it's wonderfully
useful information to know. When I get a chance, I'll add that to my TOC
Tips article because it does provide a way to add a single heading to a TOC.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a6023bf642689@uwe...
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been
opened.

[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1



  #10   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Note that a (brief) description of the \u switch is included in the article
on the Document Map at http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm
(written by Daiya Mitchell).

Of course, it's still a good idea to explain the switch in your TOC Tips
article. To tell you the truth, I kind of assumed you had already done that!
:-)

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
Since I also build TOCs based on styles and rarely fiddle with outline
levels, I also hadn't figured out this difference, but it's wonderfully
useful information to know. When I get a chance, I'll add that to my TOC
Tips article because it does provide a way to add a single heading to a
TOC.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a6023bf642689@uwe...
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been
opened.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1









  #11   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Note that a (brief) description of the \u switch is included in the article
on the Document Map at http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm
(written by Daiya Mitchell).

Of course, it's still a good idea to explain the switch in your TOC Tips
article. To tell you the truth, I kind of assumed you had already done that!
:-)

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
Since I also build TOCs based on styles and rarely fiddle with outline
levels, I also hadn't figured out this difference, but it's wonderfully
useful information to know. When I get a chance, I'll add that to my TOC
Tips article because it does provide a way to add a single heading to a
TOC.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a6023bf642689@uwe...
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been
opened.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1







  #12   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default Unwanted text in TOC

And how could I have figured that out? Here are the descriptions from the
field options dialog:

\o Builds a table of content by using outline levels instead of TC entries
\u Builds a table of content by using the applied paragraph outline level

Pam

Pamelia Caswell wrote:
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that

[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1

  #13   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

[...] I'd still want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.


Pam, note that this is also covered in the linked article.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a6023bf642689@uwe...
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been
opened.

[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1



  #14   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Suzanne S. Barnhill Suzanne S. Barnhill is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33,624
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Since I also build TOCs based on styles and rarely fiddle with outline
levels, I also hadn't figured out this difference, but it's wonderfully
useful information to know. When I get a chance, I'll add that to my TOC
Tips article because it does provide a way to add a single heading to a TOC.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a6023bf642689@uwe...
Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still
want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long
added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked
up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been
opened.

[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1



  #15   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Hi, Stefan,

Oh, that's a much faster way to clear up the problem TOC--but I'd still want
to rid my document of those spurious headings and paragraph levels.

I've often wondered about the difference between \o and \u. I've long added
the paragraph level to style definitions to so the style would get picked up
by the TOC, and I've deleted the \u with no effect. Now I know that's
because \u applies to _direct formatting_.

Thanks so much,

Pam

Stefan Blom wrote:
If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been opened.

[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201004/1



  #16   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Stefan Blom[_3_] Stefan Blom[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,897
Default Unwanted text in TOC

If your assumption is correct, deleting the \u switch from the TOC field
code would suffice (the switch instructs Word to include paragraphs that
have outline levels 1--9 applied as direct formatting). See also
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/DocumentMap.htm.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com" u43222@uwe wrote in message
news:a5d98d0b07c46@uwe...
The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been opened.
Fix that in the paragraph dialog (I'm using W2007 and don't remember the
W2003 steps anymore). Then resolve not to use the document map (at least
until its successor, the navigation pane come out in W2010).

Pam

DeanV wrote:
For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body
text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201003/1



  #17   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
derflederdog derflederdog is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Chances are you have text in your document that is (incorrectly) of a style
that Word includes in TOCs. In other words, the stuff that is in the TOC
from your cover page is probably a Heading 1/2/3/etc. style.

Change the style of the text that is erroneously in your TOC and regenerate
your TOC and your problem will likely go away.

"DeanV" wrote:

For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.

  #18   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com Pamelia Caswell via OfficeKB.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default Unwanted text in TOC

The unwanted TOC paragraphs may have the wrong paragraph outline level
applied. This sometimes happens if the the document map has been opened.
Fix that in the paragraph dialog (I'm using W2007 and don't remember the
W2003 steps anymore). Then resolve not to use the document map (at least
until its successor, the navigation pane come out in W2010).

Pam

DeanV wrote:
For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.


--
Message posted via OfficeKB.com
http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...ement/201003/1

  #19   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
derflederdog derflederdog is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Unwanted text in TOC

Chances are you have text in your document that is (incorrectly) of a style
that Word includes in TOCs. In other words, the stuff that is in the TOC
from your cover page is probably a Heading 1/2/3/etc. style.

Change the style of the text that is erroneously in your TOC and regenerate
your TOC and your problem will likely go away.

"DeanV" wrote:

For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.

  #20   Report Post  
Tshering Tshering is offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 0
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanV View Post
For Word 2003, I'm picking up unwanted text in the TOC from 1) Cover page
with unique page setup 2) text within the document.

I've checked the unwanted text to ensure they are formatted with 'body text'
and don't see any paragraph characters beside them.

Thanks.
You are experiencing unwanted text in the TOC because of formatting error. You should format your body in "Normal" format and not under any "Header". Please click on any part of body and check. If you wrote any body part under "Header", that will show up in your TOC. It is easy to fix. Just highlight your body, click Cltr+Alt+0 or just click on the "Normal". Hope this helps you all.
Tshering


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unwanted Text Box Dave New Users 3 October 21st 08 04:10 PM
TOC - unwanted text ebishop Microsoft Word Help 5 June 21st 07 09:42 PM
Unwanted Text Formatting lmr Microsoft Word Help 2 December 22nd 05 04:17 PM
Unwanted text Ex-telco Microsoft Word Help 1 October 31st 05 12:22 AM
Unwanted gray is behind text in footer auto-text in Word 2002 (SP. Dan McGarigle Microsoft Word Help 2 March 3rd 05 10:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Microsoft Office Word Forum - WordBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Word"