[basils57]

I wonder if anyone can help please?

I've created documents containing a table in Word in portrait mode, and
by necessity, with quite a full page - 0.5cm margin top & bottom.

Once I apply a watermark to the page the bottom cell of the table
'drops' to a newly inserted sheet, thus making a 3 page doc a 4 pager,
and destroying the table appearance. This is irrespective of the font
size of the watermark etc.

Any ideas please why this is occurring and how I can get around it?




--
basils57

[Stefan Blom]

Press Ctrl+Shift+8 to display nonprinting marks. Format the paragraph mark
(¶) immediately below the table as line spacing 1 pt, and with zero spacing
before and after. That should help. If necessary, do the same with the blank
paragraphs in headers and footers.

See also http://sbarnhill.mvps.org/WordFAQs/BlankPage.htm.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP


"basils57" wrote in message
...

I wonder if anyone can help please?

I've created documents containing a table in Word in portrait mode, and
by necessity, with quite a full page - 0.5cm margin top & bottom.

Once I apply a watermark to the page the bottom cell of the table
'drops' to a newly inserted sheet, thus making a 3 page doc a 4 pager,
and destroying the table appearance. This is irrespective of the font
size of the watermark etc.

Any ideas please why this is occurring and how I can get around it?




--
basils57

[basils57[_2_]]

Thanks for that - the only problem is that there isn't a paragraph mark
below or immediately below the table.
The bottom cell has dropped to a new page and the re is a page break,
nothiong else, below it on that page.




--
basils57

[basils57[_3_]]

If I take the watermark off the page, then I can do as you suggest.

Formatting the para mark immediately below the table makes no
difference and once the w/m is applied - the bottom table cell row
drops.

Taking the w/m off again, and doing the same with the header & footer
as suggested, then this immediately drops the cell row even before
adding a w/m. This seems strange (header & footer), I would have
thought it would have had the opposite effect?




--
basils57

[Beth Melton]

Try setting the Text Wrapping for the watermark to "Behind Text".

Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton
Microsoft Office MVP

Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook

Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word
TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/

"basils57" wrote in message
...

If I take the watermark off the page, then I can do as you suggest.

Formatting the para mark immediately below the table makes no
difference and once the w/m is applied - the bottom table cell row
drops.

Taking the w/m off again, and doing the same with the header & footer
as suggested, then this immediately drops the cell row even before
adding a w/m. This seems strange (header & footer), I would have
thought it would have had the opposite effect?




--
basils57

[basils57[_4_]]

Thanks for that Beth, will see how it goes.

Beth Melton;2631534 Wrote:
Try setting the Text Wrapping for the watermark to "Behind Text".

Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton
Microsoft Office MVP





--
basils57