Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
troff output .... now there's a glimmer from a murky past. Even the
hard-coded error messages were witty. "Margaret Aldis" wrote in message ... LOL - this thread certainly brought back some memories :-). In the 1970s ICL provided cans of rubber cement for the odd occasions when the authors did their own CRC. I can remember a colleague literally falling over in hysterics at the end of a long afternoon pasting in pictures of data entry forms. (I also remember when the cleaners, searching for coins or snacks in someone's top drawer, left a poorly lidded can on its side ... ). When we got into CRC in a big way here in the 80s we quickly found that sticking graphics into hundreds of pages of troff output and meeting printers' deadlines demanded a proper scalpel, wax roller kit and a home-made light box. By that stage we had an artist producing graphics on the Mac and had left the Rotring and the Letraset behind - I think the Letraset finally got thrown out when it started spattering tiny shards in the drawer with the slide rule! -- Margaret Aldis - Microsoft Word MVP Syntagma partnership site: http://www.syntagma.co.uk Word MVP FAQ site: http://www.word.mvps.org "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message ... I did this only in an amateurish sort of way. I used rubber cement, too, though also flirted with glue sticks and spray adhesive and roll-on adhesives of various sorts. It would have helped tremendously to have a light box, something I acquired only after my need for it was largely over (I had to depend on eyeballing and windowpanes). But my paste-ups were not for CRC--just manuscripts. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Jezebel" wrote in message ... Rubber cement was a buzz, indeed, (although I have grave doubts about the quality your cannabis!) ... but a waxing machine was what the pros all used. I'll bet your Letraset's lost all its serifs by now. "Jay Freedman" wrote in message ... You used wax? We used rubber cement -- almost as much fun as cannabis! We had a little photosetter for headlines, but we did use tons of Letraset for labeling illustrations. I still have a box of it tucked away under my desk (not far from the slide rule). -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:57:20 +1100, "Jezebel" wrote: Not nearly as much fun, though. Don't you miss the smell of wax, or all those hours spent Letrasetting the headings? "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message .. . In the "olden days" when I created documents on a typewriter, CRC was routinely "shot down" because typewriter text was large and ungainly and illustrations that weren't necessarily perfect were enhanced by reduction. In those days, graphs, drawings, photographs, etc., had to be pasted up on the CRC. If you'd ever visited a newspaper or an ad agency, you would have seen people "making up pages" in this way. Creating a document using page layout software (or even word processing software such as Word) is exponentially easier than it was in those days! -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "C Tate" wrote in message ... Thank you both very much indeed for such helpful replies. Is there anything I can refer to to learn even more about this? (It sounds like just making sure your document is perfect for the camera though there are sometimes other considerations such as the CRC being a fixed percentage larger than the ultimate output). "Jay Freedman" wrote in message ... C Tate wrote: Hope this doesn't seem a slightly off the wall question! But if somebody asks for 'camera ready copy' in Word what exactly do they mean?!!!! In offset printing (the cheapest, easiest method), someone uses a press camera to take a picture of each original page. Through several steps the negative from that camera is used to make printing plates that apply ink to sheets of paper. The original page is "camera ready" when it contains all the text and graphics that should be in the final printing, and nothing else. (Technically, since the film in the press camera is insensitive to light blue, it's possible to write comments on camera ready pages with light blue pencil. This is usually allowed only in the margins, though.) It means a spell-check has been done, all corrections have been made, all fonts and formatting are in place, headers and footers are included, etc. This isn't exclusively a Word thing -- in fact, once you've used the computer printer to put a Word document on paper, it doesn't matter whether the pages came from Word or from Mars. In fact, I would never say that a document is "camera ready" while it exists only as an electronic document. The amount of work needed to convert camera ready copy into printing plates, and the extra work and expense that may be needed to fix errors after that stage, mean that you have to be very sure that everything is right before you say the pages are "camera ready". -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
copy paste without losing style | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Why will Word 2003 not allow me to copy text? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
How to use WORD2003:Tools>Options>Save-> Make local copy of files. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Copy and past a page and it's layout from one doc to another. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Cannot copy text which appears with black dots below it! | Microsoft Word Help |