Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Puzzler50
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mail merge in Word 2003 is more cumbersome than in previous versio

There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also parts
that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily select a merge
field on the fly, while creating the document. I could quickly add
punctuation, spacing, partial sentences, etc. Now I am out of the document
when I select the merge fields to be incorporated. It takes several extra
keystrokes to insert a variety of fields, especially if the fields are being
inserted into the text of the document.

I have been a heavy user of mail merging for 15 years, and find this to be a
step backward.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...merge.fi elds
  #2   Report Post  
Graham Mayor
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.gmayor.com/mail_merge_lab...th_word_xp.htm s hould put you
back on track.

--

Graham Mayor - Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org


Puzzler50 wrote:
There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also
parts that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily
select a merge field on the fly, while creating the document. I
could quickly add punctuation, spacing, partial sentences, etc. Now
I am out of the document when I select the merge fields to be
incorporated. It takes several extra keystrokes to insert a variety
of fields, especially if the fields are being inserted into the text
of the document.

I have been a heavy user of mail merging for 15 years, and find this
to be a step backward.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click
the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the
button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft
Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...merge.fi elds



  #3   Report Post  
Jim Hawkins
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Puzzler50" wrote in message
...
There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also
parts
that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily select a merge
field on the fly, while creating the document. I could quickly add
punctuation, spacing, partial sentences, etc. Now I am out of the
document
when I select the merge fields to be incorporated. It takes several extra
keystrokes to insert a variety of fields, especially if the fields are
being
inserted into the text of the document.

I have been a heavy user of mail merging for 15 years, and find this to be
a
step backward.

Agreed. Word2000 got it about right.

Jim Hawkins


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Word 2002 and Word 2003 trading default file association Enochscion Microsoft Word Help 2 May 27th 05 10:19 PM
Word 2003 SP1 mail merge data issue Richard W Mailmerge 2 May 16th 05 10:31 PM
Word 2003 Mail Merge kskap36 Mailmerge 1 April 13th 05 09:19 AM
mail merge hyperlinks in Word 2003 M Mailmerge 0 April 12th 05 10:16 PM
Mail merge toolbar unavailable after SP3 R Scott Lowden Mailmerge 1 December 1st 04 06:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Microsoft Office Word Forum - WordBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Word"