Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Mail merge 2000, 2003 difference...
Hi,
I am using a CSV generated by another company and the CSV has many address fields including Name1 and Name2. When using Mail merge 2000, I specified that they should be on a separate line and if Name2 was blank, Word 2000 would ignore it and place the rest of the address info below Name1. Now I want to do the same in Word 2003. In 2003 the task pane (in step 3 of 6) has an item called Address Block which I click on to get the Insert Address Block dialog box. The dialog box has a button called Match Fields... and I've tried playing with matching the fields but I haven't hit the right combination yet to do what I used to do in Word 2000. I figured that someone has encountered this situation before and could help me out. I haven't given up trying but first I want to ask if what I'm doing is possible and, if so, then what are the steps to accomplish this. Thanks in advance! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Advantage of Mail Merge 2003 over Mail Merge 2000 | Mailmerge | |||
Mail merge - Word 2003/Access 2000 | Mailmerge | |||
Keep mail merge format from 2000 when using 2003! | Mailmerge | |||
mailmerge difference between 2000 and 2003 | Mailmerge | |||
Using Mail Merge in Word 2003 with Access 2000 | Mailmerge |