[JT Klipfer]

Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using the \t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my {INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index type so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps defaulting back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries. In a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index, Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my {INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT

[JT Klipfer]

Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries. Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries. In a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index, Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my {INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries. Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries. In a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really sort
of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries. Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries. In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

Good to know. (I have to confess I know almost nothing about the Table of
Authorities feature.)

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries. Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries. In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices:
one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style,
but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

Me, either. Since I don't type legal briefs, I've never had a need for this
feature (or a need to figure out what it does/how it works).

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
Good to know. (I have to confess I know almost nothing about the Table of
Authorities feature.)

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries. Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries.
In a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices:
one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style,
but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.

[JT Klipfer]

Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries. Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries. In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

The "Notify" feature may be broken (that seems to happen often in the
Microsoft web interface).

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
news
Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this
by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries.
Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries.
In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented
index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices:
one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm
using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style,
but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

It's been Out of Order for several weeks now.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
The "Notify" feature may be broken (that seems to happen often in the
Microsoft web interface).

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
news
Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this
by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries.
Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index entries.
In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented
index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on, up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices:
one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm
using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the
word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented
index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type
of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style,
but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

I suspected that, but I wasn't sure. I do occasionally use the web
interface, but I never use the notification.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP




"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
It's been Out of Order for several weeks now.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
The "Notify" feature may be broken (that seems to happen often in the
Microsoft web interface).

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
news
Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to
split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around this
by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries.
Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index
entries.
In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented
index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on,
up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices:
one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm
using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the
word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented
index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type
of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2
style,
but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this
really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

I never use either, but there keep being reports in the private NGs, and the
latest is that, once again, NNTP posts aren't making it to the Web at all.
sigh

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
I suspected that, but I wasn't sure. I do occasionally use the web
interface, but I never use the notification.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP




"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
It's been Out of Order for several weeks now.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
The "Notify" feature may be broken (that seems to happen often in the
Microsoft web interface).

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
news Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to
split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around
this
by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries.
Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index
entries.
In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented
index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on,
up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in
message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two
indices:
one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm
using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the
word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to
my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented
index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type
of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2
style,
but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my
definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this
really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

That is bad news. :-(

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
I never use either, but there keep being reports in the private NGs, and
the latest is that, once again, NNTP posts aren't making it to the Web at
all. sigh

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
I suspected that, but I wasn't sure. I do occasionally use the web
interface, but I never use the notification.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP




"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
It's been Out of Order for several weeks now.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
The "Notify" feature may be broken (that seems to happen often in the
Microsoft web interface).

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
news Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to
split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around
this
by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA entries.
Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index
entries.
In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented
index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so on,
up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in
message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two
indices:
one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm
using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the
word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show.
The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to
my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented
index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a
columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in
type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2
style,
but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my
definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this
really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.

[Stefan Blom[_3_]]

At least it was fixed more quickly this time...

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
That is bad news. :-(

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
I never use either, but there keep being reports in the private NGs, and
the latest is that, once again, NNTP posts aren't making it to the Web at
all. sigh

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
I suspected that, but I wasn't sure. I do occasionally use the web
interface, but I never use the notification.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP




"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
It's been Out of Order for several weeks now.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in message
...
The "Notify" feature may be broken (that seems to happen often in the
Microsoft web interface).

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in message
news Oh sorry ... I must not have turned on auto notify!

Anyway, that was the exact article I found that gave me the idea to
split
them up. Thanks Stefan & Suzanne!--JT

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Shauna has an article about a similar use:
http://www.ShaunaKelly.com/word/glossary/glossary.html

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Stefan Blom" wrote in
message
...
That seems like a clever workaround!

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in
message
...
Hi Stefan--Thanks for letting me know. I've found a way around
this
by
making my acronyms indexed entries and my definitions TOA
entries.
Not
perfect, but it gets the job done! Thanks again.--JT

"Stefan Blom" wrote:

You can't control which styles are being used for the index
entries.
In
a
run-in index, all entries use the Index 1 style; in an indented
index,
Word
applies the appropriate Index style (Index 1, Index 2, and so
on, up
to
Index 9) based on the level of indentation.

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP



"JT Klipfer" wrote in
message
...
Hi,

I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two
indices:
one
for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm
using
the
\t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the
word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show.
The
problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to
my
{INDEX}
field.

For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented
index
type
so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a
columnar
fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.

But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in
type of
index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2
style,
but
I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps
defaulting
back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.

I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my
definitions
list
with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this
really
sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated!

--JT



.




.