Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.word.formatting.longdocs,microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Simplifying finding cross-refs: adding descriptive text at end of NOTEREF field harmless or not?
I need a convenient way to be able to find specific cross-references in a
large document (and to know what they are without having to follow the link), but the most obvious way of searching the field codes (when in displayed instead of field results) is meaningless with cross-references unlike with bookmarks (e.g. NOTEREF _Ref203031962 etc.). The solution that I found is that I could add descriptive text to the end of the field code with no apparent harm done in a small test case. I was wondering if I adopted this on the scale of my large document whether I would eventually introduce some sort instability, unreliability, or other types of problems? Or is there some other solution? DSC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
adding a text form field into a header | New Users | |||
How do i insert descriptive text in a picture??? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Superscripted cross-refs change to regular font size? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
index ALL cross refs | Microsoft Word Help | |||
cross-refs across included documents | Formatting Long Documents |