Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.access.formscoding,microsoft.public.word.docmanagement,microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields,microsoft.public.word.mailmergefields
|
|||
|
|||
Supress "Opening this document with run the following SQL command"
If you use the Community Bridge to access the newsgroups via an NNTP
newsreader, the experience is much the same as that to which you are accustomed. -- Hope this helps, Doug Robbins - Word MVP dkr[atsymbol]mvps[dot]org "Walter Briscoe" wrote in message ... In message of Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:10:40 in microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields, Graham Mayor writes If you don't make the registry change, you merely have to acknowledge the prompt. There's a macro at http://www.gmayor.com/word_vba_examples.htm which will toggle the prompt on/off, but as it writes to the registry, I don't suppose your company IT Nazis will approve of that either? Software does however write to the registry all the time. Agreed, the forums are poor, but they are the future ... unless everyone come back here I hope the forums are not the future, but fear I will be wrong. On reading Doug Robbins recommendation, I followed the link. I don't think he model does not give me what I have traditionally had with newsgroups and I don't like what I do get. e.g. 1) one line per thread subject. 2) threading so I can tell the relationship between posts. This thread is not a good example, as it consists of 4 messages: a) Chris K posted the first message; b) Doub Robbins replied to message a) c) Chris K replied to message b) d) Graham replied to message c). 3) I normally open a window in which threads containing new messages appear first and others in which I retain an interest are then shown. I can mark all messages as read, mark messages as interesting, and/or to be retained. I can zap old messages when I choose. 4) I can batch download messages for future attention. I don't need an Internet connection except when sending messages or grabbing them. 5) Cross-posting is supported. Used well, it can be helpful. 5) I can use Google groups to search a vast history of messages. 6) Group, and message creation is largely anarchic. There are probably virtues in the forums. All I can see to date is 1) They are promoted by Microsoft. 2) Their Traffic is likely to be heavier than in traditional newsgroups now that they exist. 3) Less spam - I assume this is true. -- Walter Briscoe |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.access.formscoding,microsoft.public.word.docmanagement,microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields,microsoft.public.word.mailmergefields
|
|||
|
|||
Supress "Opening this document with run the following SQL command"
You can download the Answers Bridge (provided by MS even though it does
claim to be "not a Microsoft developed application") from https://connect.microsoft.com/Micros...?wa=wsignin1.0 and the Community Bridge (written by an MVP) from http://communitybridge.codeplex.com/. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA http://word.mvps.org "Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote in message ... If you use the Community Bridge to access the newsgroups via an NNTP newsreader, the experience is much the same as that to which you are accustomed. -- Hope this helps, Doug Robbins - Word MVP dkr[atsymbol]mvps[dot]org "Walter Briscoe" wrote in message ... In message of Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:10:40 in microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields, Graham Mayor writes If you don't make the registry change, you merely have to acknowledge the prompt. There's a macro at http://www.gmayor.com/word_vba_examples.htm which will toggle the prompt on/off, but as it writes to the registry, I don't suppose your company IT Nazis will approve of that either? Software does however write to the registry all the time. Agreed, the forums are poor, but they are the future ... unless everyone come back here I hope the forums are not the future, but fear I will be wrong. On reading Doug Robbins recommendation, I followed the link. I don't think he model does not give me what I have traditionally had with newsgroups and I don't like what I do get. e.g. 1) one line per thread subject. 2) threading so I can tell the relationship between posts. This thread is not a good example, as it consists of 4 messages: a) Chris K posted the first message; b) Doub Robbins replied to message a) c) Chris K replied to message b) d) Graham replied to message c). 3) I normally open a window in which threads containing new messages appear first and others in which I retain an interest are then shown. I can mark all messages as read, mark messages as interesting, and/or to be retained. I can zap old messages when I choose. 4) I can batch download messages for future attention. I don't need an Internet connection except when sending messages or grabbing them. 5) Cross-posting is supported. Used well, it can be helpful. 5) I can use Google groups to search a vast history of messages. 6) Group, and message creation is largely anarchic. There are probably virtues in the forums. All I can see to date is 1) They are promoted by Microsoft. 2) Their Traffic is likely to be heavier than in traditional newsgroups now that they exist. 3) Less spam - I assume this is true. -- Walter Briscoe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Opening this will run the following SQL command | Mailmerge | |||
How to prevent sql command warning when opening merge document | Mailmerge | |||
"Opening this document will run the following SQL command" prompt problem | Mailmerge | |||
MS Word Warning on start up run SQL command - How to stop? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Word Merge "opening this document will run the following SQL comma | Mailmerge |