The article to which I referred you (both) has a section specifically about
how to preserve section formatting when deleting material at the end of a
document. Since the mvps.org server is currently down, I can't point you to
the specific section, but it is toward the end.
The article explains the way section formatting works. This understanding is
basic to working with sections. When you have only a single section, the
section formatting is held in the final paragraph mark. When you insert a
section break, it holds the formatting for the previous section, and the
final paragraph mark holds the formatting for the final section. If you want
to delete the section break (and the material following it), you must copy
its formatting to the last section first.
Microsoft does provide paid support for users. Free support is provided
through these NGs. I don't feel any need to support a "poor product." It is
a poor workman who blames his tools; you view Word as a "poor product"
because you are unwilling to learn how to use it.
You will also find, it you want to use these NGs regularly, that an NNTP
newsreader such as Outlook Express makes this far easier; see
http://www.gmayor.com/MSNews.htm
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
"Steve H" Steve
wrote in message
...
Ms. Barnhill -
Did you read the e-mails posted here? Do you realize that there were two
separate posters (Kate Stiteler and Ken S.) and not one?
I understand that you are a Word MVP and do not work for Microsoft. And
for
what it's worth, my thanks go to you and other "volunteers" for the time
you
devote to trying to explain Microsoft's flawed products. But, to claim
that
your post is not representative of Microsoft is disingenuous at best. I
linked to this thread on Microsoft's website by clicking a link in the
Help
program for Microsoft Word. So although you may not be a Microsoft
employee,
Microsoft is definitely using you to try to defend and explain their poor
product. Why can't Microsoft themselves respond to this question about
their
own product? Why do they need to rely on non-employees to explain their
product? Regarding Ken S.'s post, regardless of your status with respect
to
Microsoft, this thread is a "response by Microsoft" and a poor one at
that.
I had a similar question as Ken S. about the major annoyance of deleting a
section break and losing all of the formatting of the section that I am
keeping. I read the article that you linked to, but I did not find it to
be
very helpful. For one thing, the article did not specifically address
Ken's
(and my) question about deleting a section break without losing the
section
formatting that precedes that break. Basically, the take-home message is
that there is no solution for this problem other than formatting the
second
section to exactly match the first section before deleting the section
break.
Regardless of your (and other MVP's) good intentions, the fact remains
that
Word is a flawed product and this section break nonsense makes no sense at
all. In most cultures where Word and other Microsoft products are sold,
people write from beginning to end. We write a section, format it, create
a
section break, and then repeat. Why on earth should we lose the
formatting
for the first section when we delete the section break? A section break
is
created when we want a new section, but why is that section break for the
new
section suddenly imbued with the properties and formatting of the
preceding
section? That makes no sense. Look at it this way - if I have a
one-section
document with no section breaks, I can apply formatting to that section,
right? So why does everything change and all of the formatting for that
section is suddenly applied to a section break that I happen to insert at
the
end of that section?
One more complaint and then my rant will be over: I tried to reply to
this
thread inside the Word Help window, but it didn't work (natch). I had to
go
online with my favorite browser (Opera, obviously not IE) to find this
thread
so that I could reply.