Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm confused about this issue. I read the following in Word Help:
Security Because macros can contain viruses, be careful about running them. Take the following precautions: run up-to-date antivirus software on your computer; set your macro security level to high; clear the Trust all installed add-ins and templates check box; use digital signatures; maintain a list of trusted publishers. It also instructed me how to "remove" a macro publisher from the Trusted list. So I cleared the indicated checkbox and deleted two "trusted publishers," (both Gateway and both "expired"). Then when I opened an old document I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to enable or disable a macro that this document "contained." It suggested that if I "disabled," I might have trouble with the document. So I clicke "enable." The "publisher" in this case was Microsoft--though the permission installed showed that it "expired" in November, 2003! My question is, since I know nothing of macros and have no interest in using them, is it safe for me to refuse to accept any? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi JD,
It's always "safe" to refuse to accept any macros. The tradeoff is that you will lose any functionality provided by macros that really are safe to run. In my opinion, the extreme paranoia about macro viruses expressed by the Help is unwarranted. The expletive deleted lowlifes who delight in others' misery seem to have discovered that hacking Internet Explorer is easier or more satisfying than messing with Office macros. Running antivirus software that looks for virus signatures is less intrusive than summarily disabling all macros. If the idea of the faint possibility of a macro virus bothers you, though, feel free to block macros. There are a few things you can accomplish in Word only by using a macro. These are rare, and if you find that you need them you can enable them each time. You may run into trouble with third-party software that tries to integrate with Office by supplying macros in global templates. By disabling their macros, you lose that integration. You may see toolbar buttons that don't do anything when clicked, etc. -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:05:15 -0700, "JD" wrote: I'm confused about this issue. I read the following in Word Help: Security Because macros can contain viruses, be careful about running them. Take the following precautions: run up-to-date antivirus software on your computer; set your macro security level to high; clear the Trust all installed add-ins and templates check box; use digital signatures; maintain a list of trusted publishers. It also instructed me how to "remove" a macro publisher from the Trusted list. So I cleared the indicated checkbox and deleted two "trusted publishers," (both Gateway and both "expired"). Then when I opened an old document I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to enable or disable a macro that this document "contained." It suggested that if I "disabled," I might have trouble with the document. So I clicke "enable." The "publisher" in this case was Microsoft--though the permission installed showed that it "expired" in November, 2003! My question is, since I know nothing of macros and have no interest in using them, is it safe for me to refuse to accept any? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Jay. I'm still wondering why I am offered the choice of "enabling" a
macro published by Microsoft in a document that I created a long time ago and that has never been off of this computer. I think of macros as bits of code written to make Word do things that it doesn't normally do. Is that correct? If so, I don't know why I would want or need any macros to run in any of my Word documents. I'm not on a network, though I do occasionally send them to friends and relatives. The fact the the document which prompted this post was found to contain two macros published by Gateway (my computer brand) makes me wonder why they were there. And also, since I "removed" them, have I crippled my computer in some way? Also, if I may further impose, what is the significance of the "expiration date" on these macros? All that I have seen are "expired" in 2003! And finally, does the acceptance or rejection of macros apply on a per document basis? That is to say that if I refuse a macro, will that apply only to the document currently open or to all of my documents, present and future? I guess I'm leery about making a decision that I barely understand and that might be irreversible. Thanks for you help. It is greatly appreciated. "Jay Freedman" wrote in message ... Hi JD, It's always "safe" to refuse to accept any macros. The tradeoff is that you will lose any functionality provided by macros that really are safe to run. In my opinion, the extreme paranoia about macro viruses expressed by the Help is unwarranted. The expletive deleted lowlifes who delight in others' misery seem to have discovered that hacking Internet Explorer is easier or more satisfying than messing with Office macros. Running antivirus software that looks for virus signatures is less intrusive than summarily disabling all macros. If the idea of the faint possibility of a macro virus bothers you, though, feel free to block macros. There are a few things you can accomplish in Word only by using a macro. These are rare, and if you find that you need them you can enable them each time. You may run into trouble with third-party software that tries to integrate with Office by supplying macros in global templates. By disabling their macros, you lose that integration. You may see toolbar buttons that don't do anything when clicked, etc. Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:05:15 -0700, "JD" wrote: I'm confused about this issue. I read the following in Word Help: Security Because macros can contain viruses, be careful about running them. Take the following precautions: run up-to-date antivirus software on your computer; set your macro security level to high; clear the Trust all installed add-ins and templates check box; use digital signatures; maintain a list of trusted publishers. It also instructed me how to "remove" a macro publisher from the Trusted list. So I cleared the indicated checkbox and deleted two "trusted publishers," (both Gateway and both "expired"). Then when I opened an old document I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to enable or disable a macro that this document "contained." It suggested that if I "disabled," I might have trouble with the document. So I clicke "enable." The "publisher" in this case was Microsoft--though the permission installed showed that it "expired" in November, 2003! My question is, since I know nothing of macros and have no interest in using them, is it safe for me to refuse to accept any? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, I found that a keyboard shortcut saved in a document will be tagged as
a "macro," and you'll get the warning dialog for it. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JD" wrote in message ... Thanks Jay. I'm still wondering why I am offered the choice of "enabling" a macro published by Microsoft in a document that I created a long time ago and that has never been off of this computer. I think of macros as bits of code written to make Word do things that it doesn't normally do. Is that correct? If so, I don't know why I would want or need any macros to run in any of my Word documents. I'm not on a network, though I do occasionally send them to friends and relatives. The fact the the document which prompted this post was found to contain two macros published by Gateway (my computer brand) makes me wonder why they were there. And also, since I "removed" them, have I crippled my computer in some way? Also, if I may further impose, what is the significance of the "expiration date" on these macros? All that I have seen are "expired" in 2003! And finally, does the acceptance or rejection of macros apply on a per document basis? That is to say that if I refuse a macro, will that apply only to the document currently open or to all of my documents, present and future? I guess I'm leery about making a decision that I barely understand and that might be irreversible. Thanks for you help. It is greatly appreciated. "Jay Freedman" wrote in message ... Hi JD, It's always "safe" to refuse to accept any macros. The tradeoff is that you will lose any functionality provided by macros that really are safe to run. In my opinion, the extreme paranoia about macro viruses expressed by the Help is unwarranted. The expletive deleted lowlifes who delight in others' misery seem to have discovered that hacking Internet Explorer is easier or more satisfying than messing with Office macros. Running antivirus software that looks for virus signatures is less intrusive than summarily disabling all macros. If the idea of the faint possibility of a macro virus bothers you, though, feel free to block macros. There are a few things you can accomplish in Word only by using a macro. These are rare, and if you find that you need them you can enable them each time. You may run into trouble with third-party software that tries to integrate with Office by supplying macros in global templates. By disabling their macros, you lose that integration. You may see toolbar buttons that don't do anything when clicked, etc. Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:05:15 -0700, "JD" wrote: I'm confused about this issue. I read the following in Word Help: Security Because macros can contain viruses, be careful about running them. Take the following precautions: run up-to-date antivirus software on your computer; set your macro security level to high; clear the Trust all installed add-ins and templates check box; use digital signatures; maintain a list of trusted publishers. It also instructed me how to "remove" a macro publisher from the Trusted list. So I cleared the indicated checkbox and deleted two "trusted publishers," (both Gateway and both "expired"). Then when I opened an old document I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to enable or disable a macro that this document "contained." It suggested that if I "disabled," I might have trouble with the document. So I clicke "enable." The "publisher" in this case was Microsoft--though the permission installed showed that it "expired" in November, 2003! My question is, since I know nothing of macros and have no interest in using them, is it safe for me to refuse to accept any? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How very interesting. I guess the moral of the story is that I should go
ahead and "accept" macros offered from "trusted publishers," most certainly from Microsoft. Upon reflection, I have to admit that I really don't know how a keyboard shortcut would be "saved in a document." Is this something like "embedding fonts," which applies only to one document and not to all the others on my hard drive? "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message ... FWIW, I found that a keyboard shortcut saved in a document will be tagged as a "macro," and you'll get the warning dialog for it. Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JD" wrote in message ... Thanks Jay. I'm still wondering why I am offered the choice of "enabling" a macro published by Microsoft in a document that I created a long time ago and that has never been off of this computer. I think of macros as bits of code written to make Word do things that it doesn't normally do. Is that correct? If so, I don't know why I would want or need any macros to run in any of my Word documents. I'm not on a network, though I do occasionally send them to friends and relatives. The fact the the document which prompted this post was found to contain two macros published by Gateway (my computer brand) makes me wonder why they were there. And also, since I "removed" them, have I crippled my computer in some way? Also, if I may further impose, what is the significance of the "expiration date" on these macros? All that I have seen are "expired" in 2003! And finally, does the acceptance or rejection of macros apply on a per document basis? That is to say that if I refuse a macro, will that apply only to the document currently open or to all of my documents, present and future? I guess I'm leery about making a decision that I barely understand and that might be irreversible. Thanks for you help. It is greatly appreciated. "Jay Freedman" wrote in message ... Hi JD, It's always "safe" to refuse to accept any macros. The tradeoff is that you will lose any functionality provided by macros that really are safe to run. In my opinion, the extreme paranoia about macro viruses expressed by the Help is unwarranted. The expletive deleted lowlifes who delight in others' misery seem to have discovered that hacking Internet Explorer is easier or more satisfying than messing with Office macros. Running antivirus software that looks for virus signatures is less intrusive than summarily disabling all macros. If the idea of the faint possibility of a macro virus bothers you, though, feel free to block macros. There are a few things you can accomplish in Word only by using a macro. These are rare, and if you find that you need them you can enable them each time. You may run into trouble with third-party software that tries to integrate with Office by supplying macros in global templates. By disabling their macros, you lose that integration. You may see toolbar buttons that don't do anything when clicked, etc. Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:05:15 -0700, "JD" wrote: I'm confused about this issue. I read the following in Word Help: Security Because macros can contain viruses, be careful about running them. Take the following precautions: run up-to-date antivirus software on your computer; set your macro security level to high; clear the Trust all installed add-ins and templates check box; use digital signatures; maintain a list of trusted publishers. It also instructed me how to "remove" a macro publisher from the Trusted list. So I cleared the indicated checkbox and deleted two "trusted publishers," (both Gateway and both "expired"). Then when I opened an old document I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to enable or disable a macro that this document "contained." It suggested that if I "disabled," I might have trouble with the document. So I clicke "enable." The "publisher" in this case was Microsoft--though the permission installed showed that it "expired" in November, 2003! My question is, since I know nothing of macros and have no interest in using them, is it safe for me to refuse to accept any? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whenever you save any customization (macros, AutoText, keyboard shortcuts,
toolbars), you are given a choice of where to save it. Normal.dot is the default, and so most customizations are saved there because users rarely choose to save them anywhere else. But you can save any of these customizations in a specific document template or another global template, and you can save some things in (macros, keyboard shortcuts, and toolbars, but not AutoText) in documents as well. It just depends on what you have selected under "Save in" when you create a macro or other customization. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JD" wrote in message ... How very interesting. I guess the moral of the story is that I should go ahead and "accept" macros offered from "trusted publishers," most certainly from Microsoft. Upon reflection, I have to admit that I really don't know how a keyboard shortcut would be "saved in a document." Is this something like "embedding fonts," which applies only to one document and not to all the others on my hard drive? "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message ... FWIW, I found that a keyboard shortcut saved in a document will be tagged as a "macro," and you'll get the warning dialog for it. Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JD" wrote in message ... Thanks Jay. I'm still wondering why I am offered the choice of "enabling" a macro published by Microsoft in a document that I created a long time ago and that has never been off of this computer. I think of macros as bits of code written to make Word do things that it doesn't normally do. Is that correct? If so, I don't know why I would want or need any macros to run in any of my Word documents. I'm not on a network, though I do occasionally send them to friends and relatives. The fact the the document which prompted this post was found to contain two macros published by Gateway (my computer brand) makes me wonder why they were there. And also, since I "removed" them, have I crippled my computer in some way? Also, if I may further impose, what is the significance of the "expiration date" on these macros? All that I have seen are "expired" in 2003! And finally, does the acceptance or rejection of macros apply on a per document basis? That is to say that if I refuse a macro, will that apply only to the document currently open or to all of my documents, present and future? I guess I'm leery about making a decision that I barely understand and that might be irreversible. Thanks for you help. It is greatly appreciated. "Jay Freedman" wrote in message ... Hi JD, It's always "safe" to refuse to accept any macros. The tradeoff is that you will lose any functionality provided by macros that really are safe to run. In my opinion, the extreme paranoia about macro viruses expressed by the Help is unwarranted. The expletive deleted lowlifes who delight in others' misery seem to have discovered that hacking Internet Explorer is easier or more satisfying than messing with Office macros. Running antivirus software that looks for virus signatures is less intrusive than summarily disabling all macros. If the idea of the faint possibility of a macro virus bothers you, though, feel free to block macros. There are a few things you can accomplish in Word only by using a macro. These are rare, and if you find that you need them you can enable them each time. You may run into trouble with third-party software that tries to integrate with Office by supplying macros in global templates. By disabling their macros, you lose that integration. You may see toolbar buttons that don't do anything when clicked, etc. Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:05:15 -0700, "JD" wrote: I'm confused about this issue. I read the following in Word Help: Security Because macros can contain viruses, be careful about running them. Take the following precautions: run up-to-date antivirus software on your computer; set your macro security level to high; clear the Trust all installed add-ins and templates check box; use digital signatures; maintain a list of trusted publishers. It also instructed me how to "remove" a macro publisher from the Trusted list. So I cleared the indicated checkbox and deleted two "trusted publishers," (both Gateway and both "expired"). Then when I opened an old document I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to enable or disable a macro that this document "contained." It suggested that if I "disabled," I might have trouble with the document. So I clicke "enable." The "publisher" in this case was Microsoft--though the permission installed showed that it "expired" in November, 2003! My question is, since I know nothing of macros and have no interest in using them, is it safe for me to refuse to accept any? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Suzanne,
FWIW, I found that a keyboard shortcut saved in a document will be tagged as a "macro," and you'll get the warning dialog for it. ????I don't think so.... Certainly doesn't happen here. Cindy Meister |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a document that does not contain and has never contained any macros.
It did at one time have a keyboard shortcut assigned to a Wingdings character, and I would get a macro message on opening. Perhaps my logic was incorrect, but that was the conclusion I drew. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Cindy M -WordMVP-" wrote in message news:VA.0000abb6.00437f2c@speedy... Hi Suzanne, FWIW, I found that a keyboard shortcut saved in a document will be tagged as a "macro," and you'll get the warning dialog for it. ????I don't think so.... Certainly doesn't happen here. Cindy Meister |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
macro security will not stay set | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Word macro security warning. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Prevent User from Changing Macro Security | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Save As is not working due to macro security settings | Microsoft Word Help | |||
2000 to 2002 macro and "Could not open macro storage" | Mailmerge |