1. tyrtgrg
1.1. rrg
1.1.1. aregregt
1.1.1.1 sd
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.3 )
1.1.2. ffffgvf
1.1.1.1 sdfsdf ( Shud have been 1.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 ( Shud have been 1.1.2.2 )

2. wretwer
2.1. retre
2.1.1. ertret
2.1.2. ertret
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.3 )

Use the Outline view and set the number format of the levels to achieve what
you want - then promote or demote the appropriate paragraphs.

--

Graham Mayor - Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org




viken wrote:
1. tyrtgrg
1.1. rrg
1.1.1. aregregt
1.1.1.1 sd
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.3 )
1.1.2. ffffgvf
1.1.1.1 sdfsdf ( Shud have been 1.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 ( Shud have been 1.1.2.2 )

2. wretwer
2.1. retre
2.1.1. ertret
2.1.2. ertret
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.3 )

Was numbering setup using paragraph styles?

--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP


"viken" wrote in message
...
1. tyrtgrg
1.1. rrg
1.1.1. aregregt
1.1.1.1 sd
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.3 )
1.1.2. ffffgvf
1.1.1.1 sdfsdf ( Shud have been 1.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 ( Shud have been 1.1.2.2 )

2. wretwer
2.1. retre
2.1.1. ertret
2.1.2. ertret
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.3 )

The safest way to apply numbering is to use numbered paragraph styles. You
need to set up the numbering for the whole set of styles together, as
explained in detail by Shauna Kelly he

http://www.shaunakelly.com/word/numb...Numbering.html

It looks to me like your fourth level has been defined incorrectly -
probably with the level number replaced with a literal character "1" - but
to fix this do start from the top level style or you are likely to end up
with the fourth level completely detached from the rest of the list.

--
Margaret Aldis - Microsoft Word MVP
Syntagma partnership site: http://www.syntagma.co.uk
Word MVP FAQ site: http://www.word.mvps.org


"viken" wrote in message
...
1. tyrtgrg
1.1. rrg
1.1.1. aregregt
1.1.1.1 sd
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 1.1.1.3 )
1.1.2. ffffgvf
1.1.1.1 sdfsdf ( Shud have been 1.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 ( Shud have been 1.1.2.2 )

2. wretwer
2.1. retre
2.1.1. ertret
2.1.2. ertret
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.1 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.2 )
1.1.1.1 sd ( Shud have been 2.1.2.3 )