Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi all,
wxp pro sp2, word 2003, i have some figures that i have labelled using built-in caption function in word 2003. in the text, i have used the Insert - Cross-reference - Figures (with hyperlink) e.g. "Figure 2 showed the result diagrammatically..." where clicking on Figure 2 in-text will bring me to the actual Figure 2. I am wondering how to insert cross-reference of multiple but sequential figures e.g. Figure 9-12 in the text? Would anyone be able to advice me? Thank you, jes |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jes
Insert a cross-reference to Figure 9, then insert one to Figure 12. Now, add or delete text necessary to achieve what you want to see. To help that process, do Tools Options View and set the Field Shading box to "Always". The cross-reference fields themselves will then be shaded in grey (the shading does not print). You can safely delete or change any ordinary text around the fields. Hope this helps. Shauna Kelly. Microsoft MVP. http://www.shaunakelly.com/word "xppuser" wrote in message ... hi all, wxp pro sp2, word 2003, i have some figures that i have labelled using built-in caption function in word 2003. in the text, i have used the Insert - Cross-reference - Figures (with hyperlink) e.g. "Figure 2 showed the result diagrammatically..." where clicking on Figure 2 in-text will bring me to the actual Figure 2. I am wondering how to insert cross-reference of multiple but sequential figures e.g. Figure 9-12 in the text? Would anyone be able to advice me? Thank you, jes |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See http://sbarnhill.mvps.org/WordFAQs/CombineXrefs.htm
-- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "xppuser" wrote in message ... hi all, wxp pro sp2, word 2003, i have some figures that i have labelled using built-in caption function in word 2003. in the text, i have used the Insert - Cross-reference - Figures (with hyperlink) e.g. "Figure 2 showed the result diagrammatically..." where clicking on Figure 2 in-text will bring me to the actual Figure 2. I am wondering how to insert cross-reference of multiple but sequential figures e.g. Figure 9-12 in the text? Would anyone be able to advice me? Thank you, jes |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi shauna, suzanne,
thank you for your advices, they both worked! shauna, your solution seemed simpler i just did Insert - Cross Reference, for which i have chosen the option of Figure and display label and number e.g. Figure 9, then i put a dash i.e. "-" then i did another Insert - Cross Reference for Figure 12 (so now the text appeared as Figure 9 - Figure 12), then with the shading on, i deleted the label "Figure" for Figure 12 so i ended up with Figure 9 - 12 (where Figure 9 was naturally still shaded and the number 12 remaining shaded). for the both figures, the hyperlink i.e. Ctrl+click still functional. suzanne, your solution (the one that i obtained from your site, provided by your link) whilst did work, entailed some additional steps, the additional purpose(s) of which i am not clear. would you be able to elaborate for me, for my own education in this matter? thank you both again, jes |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would appear that Shauna's solution is more elegant, but I confess I'm
not sure how it works. If I insert a figure caption using Insert | Reference | Caption (which produces "Figure 1. Some text") and then use Insert | Reference | Cross-reference to "Only label and number" of Figure 1, I get a cross-reference that says "Figure 1." If I look at the field code for it, it says, "{ REF _Ref142375545 }." With the field results displayed, I can delete "Figure ," but if I update the field, it says "Figure 1" again, which is what I would expect because it is a cross-reference to a bookmark that is still surrounding the entire label ("Figure 1") in the original caption. Perhaps Shauna can explain further. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "xppuser" wrote in message ... hi shauna, suzanne, thank you for your advices, they both worked! shauna, your solution seemed simpler i just did Insert - Cross Reference, for which i have chosen the option of Figure and display label and number e.g. Figure 9, then i put a dash i.e. "-" then i did another Insert - Cross Reference for Figure 12 (so now the text appeared as Figure 9 - Figure 12), then with the shading on, i deleted the label "Figure" for Figure 12 so i ended up with Figure 9 - 12 (where Figure 9 was naturally still shaded and the number 12 remaining shaded). for the both figures, the hyperlink i.e. Ctrl+click still functional. suzanne, your solution (the one that i obtained from your site, provided by your link) whilst did work, entailed some additional steps, the additional purpose(s) of which i am not clear. would you be able to elaborate for me, for my own education in this matter? thank you both again, jes |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
shauna, suzanne,
i spoke to soon! here is an update. shauna's method seems easy at first look but it came a little bit undone when i moved the section en-bloc elsewhere in that what appeared as Figure 32-37 (i.e. Figure 32 was shaded, followed by unshaded dash "-" followed by shaded number "37") using shauna's simple method became Figure 51-Figure 56 in the new place (where Figure 51 and Figure 56 are both shaded probably indicating that an field updates have taken place). i then have to re-do the deleting to make it appears as Figure 51-56 again. however, the hyperlinks and sequences are intact. on the other hand, suzanne's method retained the appearance as Figure x-z in the new place with the hyperlinks and sequences similarly intact. bottom line, i suppose, if you haven't got a lot of Figure this and that that may have to be moved (or moved a lot of times) then shauna's method could save some time/effort but suzanne's method although more involved would save some time later. at which point one is preferred than the other i am not sure and may be down to individual preferences or tasks at hand. shauna, suzanne, thought you might like the feedback. thank you for your help. |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, thanks for the feedback. As I suspected, when the field is updated,
you're back where you started. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "xppuser" wrote in message ... shauna, suzanne, i spoke to soon! here is an update. shauna's method seems easy at first look but it came a little bit undone when i moved the section en-bloc elsewhere in that what appeared as Figure 32-37 (i.e. Figure 32 was shaded, followed by unshaded dash "-" followed by shaded number "37") using shauna's simple method became Figure 51-Figure 56 in the new place (where Figure 51 and Figure 56 are both shaded probably indicating that an field updates have taken place). i then have to re-do the deleting to make it appears as Figure 51-56 again. however, the hyperlinks and sequences are intact. on the other hand, suzanne's method retained the appearance as Figure x-z in the new place with the hyperlinks and sequences similarly intact. bottom line, i suppose, if you haven't got a lot of Figure this and that that may have to be moved (or moved a lot of times) then shauna's method could save some time/effort but suzanne's method although more involved would save some time later. at which point one is preferred than the other i am not sure and may be down to individual preferences or tasks at hand. shauna, suzanne, thought you might like the feedback. thank you for your help. |
#8
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi xpuser
I misunderstood what you wanted. You'll need to use the method described on Suzanne's page to achieve what you want. Hope this helps. Shauna Kelly. Microsoft MVP. http://www.shaunakelly.com/word "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message ... Yes, thanks for the feedback. As I suspected, when the field is updated, you're back where you started. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "xppuser" wrote in message ... shauna, suzanne, i spoke to soon! here is an update. shauna's method seems easy at first look but it came a little bit undone when i moved the section en-bloc elsewhere in that what appeared as Figure 32-37 (i.e. Figure 32 was shaded, followed by unshaded dash "-" followed by shaded number "37") using shauna's simple method became Figure 51-Figure 56 in the new place (where Figure 51 and Figure 56 are both shaded probably indicating that an field updates have taken place). i then have to re-do the deleting to make it appears as Figure 51-56 again. however, the hyperlinks and sequences are intact. on the other hand, suzanne's method retained the appearance as Figure x-z in the new place with the hyperlinks and sequences similarly intact. bottom line, i suppose, if you haven't got a lot of Figure this and that that may have to be moved (or moved a lot of times) then shauna's method could save some time/effort but suzanne's method although more involved would save some time later. at which point one is preferred than the other i am not sure and may be down to individual preferences or tasks at hand. shauna, suzanne, thought you might like the feedback. thank you for your help. |
#9
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello
I realise this is an old post, but have a problem relating to it, so i figured this is the best place for it. I have been using the solution offered by Suzanne, and it works fine. However... If the figure captions are composed of a section-number arrangement (i.e. figure 2-5 etc...) then the reference comes back as the sum of the two numbers (returns 7 as opposed to 5-2) is there a simple way to avoid this? i've had to resort to the 'kludgy' workaround for now but would appreciate a more elegant solution, if anyone has one! Thanks Mat "xppuser" wrote: hi all, wxp pro sp2, word 2003, i have some figures that i have labelled using built-in caption function in word 2003. in the text, i have used the Insert - Cross-reference - Figures (with hyperlink) e.g. "Figure 2 showed the result diagrammatically..." where clicking on Figure 2 in-text will bring me to the actual Figure 2. I am wondering how to insert cross-reference of multiple but sequential figures e.g. Figure 9-12 in the text? Would anyone be able to advice me? Thank you, jes |
#10
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is rather a drawback, isn't it? The solution is to change the hyphen to
an en dash (which is preferred by many typographers, anyway). In the Caption Numbering dialog, when you check the box for "Include chapter number," the dropdown list for "Use separator" becomes available, and one of the options (the last one) is an en dash. There is actually a Unicode character called a "Figure Dash," that looks to me just a hair longer than an en dash. It is included only in "large" fonts such as Arial Unicode MS, however, and in any case you can't select it through the Caption Numbering dialog. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA http://word.mvps.org "Mat" wrote in message ... Hello I realise this is an old post, but have a problem relating to it, so i figured this is the best place for it. I have been using the solution offered by Suzanne, and it works fine. However... If the figure captions are composed of a section-number arrangement (i.e. figure 2-5 etc...) then the reference comes back as the sum of the two numbers (returns 7 as opposed to 5-2) is there a simple way to avoid this? i've had to resort to the 'kludgy' workaround for now but would appreciate a more elegant solution, if anyone has one! Thanks Mat "xppuser" wrote: hi all, wxp pro sp2, word 2003, i have some figures that i have labelled using built-in caption function in word 2003. in the text, i have used the Insert - Cross-reference - Figures (with hyperlink) e.g. "Figure 2 showed the result diagrammatically..." where clicking on Figure 2 in-text will bring me to the actual Figure 2. I am wondering how to insert cross-reference of multiple but sequential figures e.g. Figure 9-12 in the text? Would anyone be able to advice me? Thank you, jes |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
cross reference inserts entire figure | Microsoft Word Help | |||
reference no inside text box doesn't appear in cross referencing | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Cross Reference display problem -- deletes surrounding text | Formatting Long Documents | |||
Cross Reference shows as Zero | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Cross reference through multiple documents | Microsoft Word Help |