I find it rather annoying that Word can find "numbered items" for the
purpose of cross-referencing them but can't find them with Go To, which
would be ideal. Go To does work for everything else you can cross-reference.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"Cindy M -WordMVP-" wrote in message
news:VA.0000b412.0062ad3b@speedy...
Hi ?B?UmF2aSBHYXJn?=,

I have tried using ListNum field but still unable to use FIND. Can you
please tell how to use FIND with ListNum or SEQ fields.

Ah. I see it doesn't work with ListNum. But it does work with SEQ. I did
this:
Ctrl+F9. Within the field brackets type SEQ TestSeries. Press F9 to update
the
field (show the result). Now copy/paste a few times, Ctrl+A, F9 to get a
series
of numbers. find/Replace.

Of course, users don't want to go through all this. It usually works
pretty well
to save the basic SEQ field (plus any punctuation) as an AutoText entry.
The
user inserts that as required.

I would appreciate if you could also tell how to convert existing
AutoNum
fields to plain text without deleting them and writing numbers again
manually.

AutoNum fields (not automatic numbering)? Any other fields in the document
that
need to be retained, or can one zap them all (convert to plain text)?

Ctrl+A, Ctrl+Shift+F9 will get everything (in the selection, in this case
the
body text).

To get only certain ones, scattered about, it would require a macro.

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 8 2004)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or
reply
in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)