Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Suzanne, Charles, and Jezebel -- You all have been very helpful. Thank
you. Turning spellcheck off on the style does indeed work. If I end up going with this trick, I'd probably want to "bury" the text box in the header and footer area, to discourage users from messing with it. Putting field codes in AutoText entries only seems to work if you actually *use* such entries. That is, defining them isn't enough. But maybe that's what you were saying, Charles. The trouble with this, of course, is that I am still faced with hiding the codes. However, defining the codes in AutoText still seems to be a good idea, because they can then be used to easily restore them. I didn't quite follow Jezebel's DocVariable suggestion at first, but I saw how it worked after playing with it. Defining my codes as the name of the DocVariable achieved exactly what I wanted. The codes worked, they were completely hidden when field codes weren't displayed, and also took up no space. I can even insert carriage returns between several field codes within a single DocVariable for improved readability. Just what the doctor ordered. Thanks again to everyone. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Creating dynamic cross reference links in a Word document | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Table Format Style vs. Table Text Style | Page Layout | |||
How do I hide text (Word) but keep spacing as if text is there? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Hidden text layering | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Hidden Text - Proper Solution, or Not? | Page Layout |