Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi -
Couldn't resist responding, as I'm sure others will as well, but the first question that came to mind when I read your suggestion is "Are you still using version 6?". If 2003 (or 2002), take a look in the View Menu. By formatting the docs with Styles, the Document Map gives you exactly what you're looking for... even more efficiently than any sot of 'tab' structure could. If, for some reason, Styles aren't being used, you still have Thumbnails & Reading Layout which provide the features you mention. There are also several other exsting features that can be used for those options as well. In Excel, content does not flow from sheet to sheet. Each sheet is separate & distinct from the others. The content of each sheet also breaks down into numerous 'pages' for printing purposes. Not so in Word. The type of effect you describe is also impractical - if not impossible - in Word because it does not operate on the basis of 'pages', but rather on a 'nested container' principal. Especially for editing & revisions, content doesn't remain on any given page, so how could page tabs be of use? Even if you name the tab, that name would be misleading once the content on the page is revised & the document repaginates... which happens frequently. Would the tab name be 'linked' to any one piece of text on a page, and if so, which one? And what happens to the tab name if the text it is anchored to gets deleted? Also, your allusion to generating pdfs is already there in a properly constructed Word doc. They can readily be saved in the manner you suggest, but pdf format is for _completed_ documents. Revisions are made to the original Word doc as required, then saved as a new pdf. Trying to combine Acrobat & Word is not only a conflict of interest, but downright warfare between programming issues. The result would be a living nightmare for users and seriously complicate workflow. There is no doubt that Word has lots of room for improvement, but (IMHO, at least) MS needs to start by getting some of the garbage _out_ rather than stuffing more in. Regads |:) "paddle9" wrote: Currently, long Word documents need to have "bookmarks" at the top to navigate downwards. If Word had "tabs" like Excel for sections of a document, this would make standard documents easier to proofread for reference; easier to scan through for users; easier to edit, organise & correct for writers (especially of legal documents); better layout for computer screens; and would provide better accessibility for disabled users. After all - everthing is going "tabbed" nowadays. A macro could be built in for Adobe Acrobat conversion so that sections map onto Acrobat's "Bookmarks" facility. There are probably loads of other advanatages but this would be a step-change improvement in the word processing industry. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...ocmanagemen t |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Word 97 in Windows XP to maintain formatting | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Does Word have Keyboard Merges like Word Perfect does? | Mailmerge | |||
Word2000 letterhead merge | Mailmerge | |||
is word perfect compatible with office word? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Envelope Address | New Users |