| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
Number of pages should restart with section page numbers
Gotcha
 Cheers,Gil Asheville, NC http://www.TenSecondMedicalRecord.com "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message ... The inability to actually edit or modify AutoText entries (as you can edit a macro or modify a style) is a nuisance. What you have to do is create a new entry and save it under the same name, which I agree is less than intuitive. That's something that, on the face of it, seems like it would be a good feature, but then when you consider the huge variety of content that AutoText entries can contain (not just plain text, but graphics, fields, etc.), it makes more sense to use the full panoply of Word's editing tools and then save the entry. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Jim B" wrote in message ... Suzanne, I'm convinced. I had no idea that I could modify the AutoText entries that come with Word. (There is no menu item that says Autotext/Edit, and I had not searched the help for that task.) Thank you very much. "Oh. Never Mind." -Gilda Radner as Emily Litella "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: If you want Page X of Y to use SectionPages instead of NumPages, you can certainly change it (create a new AutoText entry and save it as "Page X of Y"), or you could create a new AutoText entry using SectionPages and call it, say, Page X of Z. Word's major strength is not in its ability to be all things to all people but in its customizability for the way *you* want it to work. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Jim B" wrote in message ... Suzanne, thank you for your prompt reply. As you wrote, it would be absurd to suggest that the NumPages field to be equal to SectionPages. They are different variables for different purposes, both useful. Let me try to state my suggestion more clearly. In the floating "Header and Footer" menu that is visible while editing headers and footers, the last choice on the menu is "Page X of Y". My suggestion relates only to the implementation of that menu choice. When that Autotext item is chosen, Word inserts "Page { PAGE } of {NUMPAGES}" into the current section's header or footer. My suggestion is to change the text expansion to "Page { PAGE } of { SECTIONPAGES }". Of course, no autotext will be right in all situations. The current implementation {NumPages} satisfies users who do not restart numbering at the beginning of sections. In documents like mine that restart the page numbers at the beginning of a section, {SectionPages} is more appropriate. In a complex document, headers and footers are defined in Word for each section. Since you know that the user is in the middle of editing a section header or footer when the autotext is available on the menu, it may be more natural for Word to insert the section's page count than the document's length. In a document without section breaks, the two implementations produce identical results. I would never have thought of your example, but when a multi-section chapter restarts numbering, neither field will work. -Jim "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: No, the NumPages field is the number of pages; it would be absurd for it to be anything else. In your case, SectionPages was the correct field to use. In cases where a multi-section chapter restarts numbering (which is continuous throughout the chapter), neither field will work, and a different workaround will be required, but having NumPages equal SectionPages wouldn't help there, either. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Jim B" Jim wrote in message ... The following is a suggestion for Microsoft's next iteration of Word. I just created a document consisting of three sections. I restarted page numbering at 1 in each section. I used the "Page x of y" footer. Now section 1 has the footers Page 1 of 7, Page 2 of 7. Then section 2 has pages numbered Page 1 of 7, Page 2 of 7. Section 3 has pages labeled Page 1 of 7, Page 2 of 7, Page 3 of 7. I think the last page of each section should always have the same page number as the page count. (For example, page 2 of 2, page 3 of 3.) It took a long time for me to figure out how to solved the problem: I replaced the "y" field with the field code {sectionpages} in the footer. Would it be a good idea for Microsoft to change the "Page x of y" autotext to default to this? ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...ocmanagemen t |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Page numbers and line number problem | Page Layout | |||
| 1st page turns into "odd" when # inserted | Page Layout | |||
| Page numbering in footers, Outside margin, Page Number + Number of Pages | Page Layout | |||
| Printing pages with roman page numbers and in different sections? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
| How to insert Page No of No of "Section" Pages | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Threaded Mode