Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graham Mayor wrote:
If you get around to installing Word 2003, you will find that the tools options settings are rather more volatile and you may then need to force a whole raft of settings with auto macros ![]() Which sounds like an excellent reason *not* to install Word 2003! Bert www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Except that, aside from a few quirks, this is the most stable version of
Word. -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Bert Coules wrote: Graham Mayor wrote: If you get around to installing Word 2003, you will find that the tools options settings are rather more volatile and you may then need to force a whole raft of settings with auto macros ![]() Which sounds like an excellent reason *not* to install Word 2003! Bert www.bertcoules.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help with vertical numbering in columns or tables (Word 2000 SP-3). | Page Layout |