Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This *can* be done in Word 2003, but I'm not sure I'd want to have to deal
with it (and note that it will not be backward-compatible). In Word 2003 (but not in earlier versions), wrapped tables can be broken across pages, and of course wrapped tables can be placed side by side. Only one of the tables would actually have to be wrapped. The other could be inline. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "hollerg" wrote in message ... I should have expanded on my intent. a) two 5 c X 70 r tables. (or longer) b) visually side by side with a gap between them. c) Each table shoulds be sortable. I would do this in excel but the formating is easier in word d) tables are individually sortable, but scroll with the slider bar together "hollerg" wrote: I want two running, sortable lists, side-by-side in word 2003. I want them to run onto following pages, if necessary. How can I do this in word 2003? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How do I set my default number of columns to 1 in Word 2003? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
How do I set-up columns using Styles in Word 2003? | Page Layout | |||
Why can't I see the label columns using Word 2003? | Mailmerge | |||
Word 2003 - Formatting Columns in Tables | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Problems with Columns in Word 2003 | Microsoft Word Help |