Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject says it all, really.
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Problem is, if the table has merged cells, there is no formal means to
determine its row structure and thus no way to determine, through code, what sorting it actually means. Consider this case: Start with a table contain four rows by five columns. In row 1, merge cells 1 and 2. In row 2, merge cells 2 and 3. In row 3, merge cells 3 and 4. In row 4, merge cells 4 and 5. Now align the cell boundaries. It *looks* like a four by four table, but it isn't. What would you want to have happen if you told Word to sort by column 2? Worse, supposing you repeat the above exercise merging vertically instead of horizontally... "outspokengolem" wrote in message ... Subject says it all, really. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Convert Word 2003 documents to WordPerfect formate | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Macros - Keyboard Commands | Microsoft Word Help | |||
how to convert wordperfect 5.0 floppy files to word | Microsoft Word Help | |||
In typing dates in Word, i.e. "January 12" how do you keep the "1. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
word xp crashes after macros are recorded | Microsoft Word Help |