Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I thought you wanted them to have independent row heights. If the
table content is different, this may be difficult to achieve, but you could set an exact row height for each row in each table such that the cumulative heights would come to the same total. Note, however, that if you are using any borders between rows, and you have a different number of rows in the two tables, the width of the border will throw the total off. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA http://word.mvps.org "MaxArk" wrote in message ... Suzanne S. Barnhill;3700140 Wrote: -It's actually easier to create the two-column section first because then, when you insert a table, it will automatically fill the column width rather than the page width. Insert a column break (Ctrl+Shift+Enter) between the two tables. - Ah-hah!! It worked! So far. I have noticed that their is a slight, but noticeable difference it the two heights of the tables. The top lines up, but the bottom is a couple pixels are off and despite trying to resize either of the tables, it is still noticeably off. Is there a way to nudge them into equilibrium? Jenn -- MaxArk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Placing Tables Side by Side | Tables | |||
How to adjust the horizontal spacing of adjacent tables | Tables | |||
Aligning adjacent cells in Tables | Tables | |||
Split tables but leave adjacent? | Tables | |||
Prevent Word from Automatically Joining Adjacent Tables | Tables |