Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
Three-column table on two-column page won't balance correctly
I am trying to make a simple one-page scoresheet. There are a few
lines of instructions at the top, a table with three columns filling most of the page, and then a few lines of comments at the bottom. The table is only about 3" wide, so I created a continuous section break between the instructions and the table and another one after the table: Instructions (one column) ------------- continuous section break --------------- Three-column table in two-column section ------------- continuous section break --------------- Few lines of text (one column) This all works except that the table will not balance correctly. If it has an odd number of rows, the extra row goes in column one. If I add one row, it also goes into column one so that the left page column is two rows longer than the right page column. What do I need to do to get Word to divide the rows evenly? I do NOT want to break the table. I want the table to continue into page column 2 so that if I change the column width, it changes in both page columns. |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
Three-column table on two-column page won't balance correctly
You can apply "Keep with next" to rows to force them into the second column.
Also, Word may have inserted an empty paragraph between the table and the Continuous break. This can be deleted. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA http://word.mvps.org "Sesquipedalian Sam" wrote in message ... I am trying to make a simple one-page scoresheet. There are a few lines of instructions at the top, a table with three columns filling most of the page, and then a few lines of comments at the bottom. The table is only about 3" wide, so I created a continuous section break between the instructions and the table and another one after the table: Instructions (one column) ------------- continuous section break --------------- Three-column table in two-column section ------------- continuous section break --------------- Few lines of text (one column) This all works except that the table will not balance correctly. If it has an odd number of rows, the extra row goes in column one. If I add one row, it also goes into column one so that the left page column is two rows longer than the right page column. What do I need to do to get Word to divide the rows evenly? I do NOT want to break the table. I want the table to continue into page column 2 so that if I change the column width, it changes in both page columns. |
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
Three-column table on two-column page won't balance correctly
On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:40:06 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill"
wrote: You can apply "Keep with next" to rows to force them into the second column. That should work, but it's inconvenient and error-prone and shouldn't be necessary. Also, Word may have inserted an empty paragraph between the table and the Continuous break. This can be deleted. Nope, no extra paragraph. I guess it's just another Word buglet. Has the counter exceeded the capacity of a 4-byte integer field (yet)? |
#4
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
Three-column table on two-column page won't balance correctly
"Keep with next" works perfectly with me.
"Sesquipedalian Sam" wrote: On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:40:06 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: You can apply "Keep with next" to rows to force them into the second column. That should work, but it's inconvenient and error-prone and shouldn't be necessary. Also, Word may have inserted an empty paragraph between the table and the Continuous break. This can be deleted. Nope, no extra paragraph. I guess it's just another Word buglet. Has the counter exceeded the capacity of a 4-byte integer field (yet)? |
#5
Posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
Three-column table on two-column page won't balance correctly
On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:16:11 -0700, win
wrote: "Keep with next" works perfectly with me. It works for a specific situation, but has a tendency to come back and bite you later when you've added or deleted rows elsewhere and now you don't want those two rows to stay together. It is *not* a good general solution. "Sesquipedalian Sam" wrote: On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:40:06 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: You can apply "Keep with next" to rows to force them into the second column. That should work, but it's inconvenient and error-prone and shouldn't be necessary. Also, Word may have inserted an empty paragraph between the table and the Continuous break. This can be deleted. Nope, no extra paragraph. I guess it's just another Word buglet. Has the counter exceeded the capacity of a 4-byte integer field (yet)? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How do I put borders around each column of my 2-column page? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Put table at top of second newspaper column after column break | Tables | |||
Column Breaks for Illustrations in 2 Column Table | Tables | |||
In a Table, How can I multiple column 1&3 to place in column 4 | Tables | |||
How to paste a column of text into a column in a Word Table | Page Layout |