Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Merge Options
Upgraded recently to MS Access 2003 (and Word 2003). What would be best
approach to merge documents to Access queries? From word document to the query opting for DDE, or ODC, or MDB, or ODBC DSN....very confusing.... or from query to the word document using word's wizard? |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Merge Options
What I would do is:
a. enable the MailMerge toolbar (e.g. View|Toolbars) b. create new merges by starting with the lefthand button, then use button 2 to select the data source etc. c. if you are seeing the list of connection methods when you select your data source, - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and never chose the connection method, choose DDE in the first instance. That's what Word 97/2000 used. - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and used ODBC, I'd probably choose OLE DB, which is the default in Word 2003 The Word 2003 MailMerge toolbar behaves differently from the WOrd 97/2000 one - it doesn't disappear/reappear depending on whether the document is a Mail merge Main document or not. The advantage of using OLE DB is that it's the (relatively) up-to-date method and does not have to start up a copy of Access each time it gets data. If you have non-ANSI Unicode character data in your data source, it's the only option that works. However, a. it does not work with all types of query, particularly "Parameter queries". With DDE, Access opens and asks for the parameters as necessary. b. it's more difficult to set it up to work with databases secured by passwords or using workgroup info. files (with DDE, Access just asks the appropriate questions when it opens, and you answer them) c. you are more likely to need "formatting switches" in your MERGEFIELD fields in Word where the data is a date or amount. The main advantage of using the Mail Merge Wizard, other than the fact that it leads you through the process, is that it lets you connect to Outlook Contacts data sources (you can't do that from the toolbar), andlets you set up new data sources in "Office Address List" format, which you also can't do from the toolbar. However, if you want to merge from Outlook COntacts, you will probably be better off selecting your contacts in Outlook and using Outlook Tools|Mail Merge... to do it. Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Upgraded recently to MS Access 2003 (and Word 2003). What would be best approach to merge documents to Access queries? From word document to the query opting for DDE, or ODC, or MDB, or ODBC DSN....very confusing.... or from query to the word document using word's wizard? |
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Merge Options
Thanks a million. Merge documents were linked using OLE DB. Now however
when other users :"open" merge documents they are asked to select a data source (theSelectData Source window). Can this process be avoided? "Peter Jamieson" wrote: What I would do is: a. enable the MailMerge toolbar (e.g. View|Toolbars) b. create new merges by starting with the lefthand button, then use button 2 to select the data source etc. c. if you are seeing the list of connection methods when you select your data source, - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and never chose the connection method, choose DDE in the first instance. That's what Word 97/2000 used. - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and used ODBC, I'd probably choose OLE DB, which is the default in Word 2003 The Word 2003 MailMerge toolbar behaves differently from the WOrd 97/2000 one - it doesn't disappear/reappear depending on whether the document is a Mail merge Main document or not. The advantage of using OLE DB is that it's the (relatively) up-to-date method and does not have to start up a copy of Access each time it gets data. If you have non-ANSI Unicode character data in your data source, it's the only option that works. However, a. it does not work with all types of query, particularly "Parameter queries". With DDE, Access opens and asks for the parameters as necessary. b. it's more difficult to set it up to work with databases secured by passwords or using workgroup info. files (with DDE, Access just asks the appropriate questions when it opens, and you answer them) c. you are more likely to need "formatting switches" in your MERGEFIELD fields in Word where the data is a date or amount. The main advantage of using the Mail Merge Wizard, other than the fact that it leads you through the process, is that it lets you connect to Outlook Contacts data sources (you can't do that from the toolbar), andlets you set up new data sources in "Office Address List" format, which you also can't do from the toolbar. However, if you want to merge from Outlook COntacts, you will probably be better off selecting your contacts in Outlook and using Outlook Tools|Mail Merge... to do it. Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Upgraded recently to MS Access 2003 (and Word 2003). What would be best approach to merge documents to Access queries? From word document to the query opting for DDE, or ODC, or MDB, or ODBC DSN....very confusing.... or from query to the word document using word's wizard? |
#4
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Merge Options
Only really by changing the registry - see
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825765 Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Thanks a million. Merge documents were linked using OLE DB. Now however when other users :"open" merge documents they are asked to select a data source (theSelectData Source window). Can this process be avoided? "Peter Jamieson" wrote: What I would do is: a. enable the MailMerge toolbar (e.g. View|Toolbars) b. create new merges by starting with the lefthand button, then use button 2 to select the data source etc. c. if you are seeing the list of connection methods when you select your data source, - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and never chose the connection method, choose DDE in the first instance. That's what Word 97/2000 used. - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and used ODBC, I'd probably choose OLE DB, which is the default in Word 2003 The Word 2003 MailMerge toolbar behaves differently from the WOrd 97/2000 one - it doesn't disappear/reappear depending on whether the document is a Mail merge Main document or not. The advantage of using OLE DB is that it's the (relatively) up-to-date method and does not have to start up a copy of Access each time it gets data. If you have non-ANSI Unicode character data in your data source, it's the only option that works. However, a. it does not work with all types of query, particularly "Parameter queries". With DDE, Access opens and asks for the parameters as necessary. b. it's more difficult to set it up to work with databases secured by passwords or using workgroup info. files (with DDE, Access just asks the appropriate questions when it opens, and you answer them) c. you are more likely to need "formatting switches" in your MERGEFIELD fields in Word where the data is a date or amount. The main advantage of using the Mail Merge Wizard, other than the fact that it leads you through the process, is that it lets you connect to Outlook Contacts data sources (you can't do that from the toolbar), andlets you set up new data sources in "Office Address List" format, which you also can't do from the toolbar. However, if you want to merge from Outlook COntacts, you will probably be better off selecting your contacts in Outlook and using Outlook Tools|Mail Merge... to do it. Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Upgraded recently to MS Access 2003 (and Word 2003). What would be best approach to merge documents to Access queries? From word document to the query opting for DDE, or ODC, or MDB, or ODBC DSN....very confusing.... or from query to the word document using word's wizard? |
#5
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Merge Options
Sorry about not being clear on this. The following question/prompt is NOT
the issue here but rather the need to reestablish a link to the query again with the presentationo of the Select Data Source Window and the options within the select window.... "Peter Jamieson" wrote: Only really by changing the registry - see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825765 Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Thanks a million. Merge documents were linked using OLE DB. Now however when other users :"open" merge documents they are asked to select a data source (theSelectData Source window). Can this process be avoided? "Peter Jamieson" wrote: What I would do is: a. enable the MailMerge toolbar (e.g. View|Toolbars) b. create new merges by starting with the lefthand button, then use button 2 to select the data source etc. c. if you are seeing the list of connection methods when you select your data source, - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and never chose the connection method, choose DDE in the first instance. That's what Word 97/2000 used. - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and used ODBC, I'd probably choose OLE DB, which is the default in Word 2003 The Word 2003 MailMerge toolbar behaves differently from the WOrd 97/2000 one - it doesn't disappear/reappear depending on whether the document is a Mail merge Main document or not. The advantage of using OLE DB is that it's the (relatively) up-to-date method and does not have to start up a copy of Access each time it gets data. If you have non-ANSI Unicode character data in your data source, it's the only option that works. However, a. it does not work with all types of query, particularly "Parameter queries". With DDE, Access opens and asks for the parameters as necessary. b. it's more difficult to set it up to work with databases secured by passwords or using workgroup info. files (with DDE, Access just asks the appropriate questions when it opens, and you answer them) c. you are more likely to need "formatting switches" in your MERGEFIELD fields in Word where the data is a date or amount. The main advantage of using the Mail Merge Wizard, other than the fact that it leads you through the process, is that it lets you connect to Outlook Contacts data sources (you can't do that from the toolbar), andlets you set up new data sources in "Office Address List" format, which you also can't do from the toolbar. However, if you want to merge from Outlook COntacts, you will probably be better off selecting your contacts in Outlook and using Outlook Tools|Mail Merge... to do it. Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Upgraded recently to MS Access 2003 (and Word 2003). What would be best approach to merge documents to Access queries? From word document to the query opting for DDE, or ODC, or MDB, or ODBC DSN....very confusing.... or from query to the word document using word's wizard? |
#6
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Merge Options
My fault actually, Victor. The following is mostly guesswork as I haven't
done these transitions except experimentally for quite some time. But a. what version of Word are the users moving from? b. what is the data source? If it was definitely OLE DB and they are moving from Word 2002, and the data source is where it is expected to be, then I can't see any obvious way to prevent the problem in the first instance. However, if you are then saving and copying the mail merge main document to others, with an OLE DB connection I would hope it would work. If it was actually Word 97/2000 and ODBC and the users still have the appropriate ODBC DSN used by the connection, then it's more or less the same story. If however, they don't have the DSN then you can try creating it. The basic problem with Word is always that you can't discover the existing Mail Merge Data Source without opening the document, but if Word can't find the data source, it unlinks it and there's no record of it. But you can't run code /before/ Word does that. If you still have the old version of Word and all your Mail Merge Main Documents are on it, it shoule be possible to go through every document, perhaps using a macro, to discover what the Data Source and Query options were, then to use VBA in the new version of Word to set the data sources up again. Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Sorry about not being clear on this. The following question/prompt is NOT the issue here but rather the need to reestablish a link to the query again with the presentationo of the Select Data Source Window and the options within the select window.... "Peter Jamieson" wrote: Only really by changing the registry - see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825765 Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Thanks a million. Merge documents were linked using OLE DB. Now however when other users :"open" merge documents they are asked to select a data source (theSelectData Source window). Can this process be avoided? "Peter Jamieson" wrote: What I would do is: a. enable the MailMerge toolbar (e.g. View|Toolbars) b. create new merges by starting with the lefthand button, then use button 2 to select the data source etc. c. if you are seeing the list of connection methods when you select your data source, - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and never chose the connection method, choose DDE in the first instance. That's what Word 97/2000 used. - if you were using Word 97/2000 before and used ODBC, I'd probably choose OLE DB, which is the default in Word 2003 The Word 2003 MailMerge toolbar behaves differently from the WOrd 97/2000 one - it doesn't disappear/reappear depending on whether the document is a Mail merge Main document or not. The advantage of using OLE DB is that it's the (relatively) up-to-date method and does not have to start up a copy of Access each time it gets data. If you have non-ANSI Unicode character data in your data source, it's the only option that works. However, a. it does not work with all types of query, particularly "Parameter queries". With DDE, Access opens and asks for the parameters as necessary. b. it's more difficult to set it up to work with databases secured by passwords or using workgroup info. files (with DDE, Access just asks the appropriate questions when it opens, and you answer them) c. you are more likely to need "formatting switches" in your MERGEFIELD fields in Word where the data is a date or amount. The main advantage of using the Mail Merge Wizard, other than the fact that it leads you through the process, is that it lets you connect to Outlook Contacts data sources (you can't do that from the toolbar), andlets you set up new data sources in "Office Address List" format, which you also can't do from the toolbar. However, if you want to merge from Outlook COntacts, you will probably be better off selecting your contacts in Outlook and using Outlook Tools|Mail Merge... to do it. Peter Jamieson "Victor Lazlo" wrote in message ... Upgraded recently to MS Access 2003 (and Word 2003). What would be best approach to merge documents to Access queries? From word document to the query opting for DDE, or ODC, or MDB, or ODBC DSN....very confusing.... or from query to the word document using word's wizard? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mail Merge Options | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Mail Merge Fields & Query Options | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Mail Merge Query Options? | Mailmerge | |||
Fax and email not appearing as merge options | Mailmerge | |||
No options for Insert Mail Merge Fields | Mailmerge |