Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a way to "join" tables in Word 2003?
I have found that this does not work in Word XP (so I assume 2003).
After Word 97 or 2000, tables now seem to be treated as separate floating objects, and so do not form part of the normal document flow as they did in Word 97. This means that removing paragraphs does not work, and it feels like a retrograde development. Is there any way of adjusting Word XP/2003 to stop tables being treaded like floating elements, and go back to the more intuitive Word 97 approach. Also, converting tables from XP to 97 is a disaster, as they are all inserted in Frames. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: In general, removing any empty paragraphs between the tables should suffice. Make sure the tables are not wrapped (wrapping is set to None). -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Loretta" wrote in message ... I have a form that I used OCR on first...now I need to make a few seperate small tables (same size) ONE table...does anyone know if that possible? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tables should not be wrapped (and therefore should not be converted to
framed tables in Word 97) unless the user has so specified. But (a) it's all too easy to nudge a table the least bit (using the table handle) in Print Layout view, thereby making it wrapped (working in Normal view is therefore safer), and (b) tables imported from the Web are an entirely different animal. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Julian Turner" wrote in message ... I have found that this does not work in Word XP (so I assume 2003). After Word 97 or 2000, tables now seem to be treated as separate floating objects, and so do not form part of the normal document flow as they did in Word 97. This means that removing paragraphs does not work, and it feels like a retrograde development. Is there any way of adjusting Word XP/2003 to stop tables being treaded like floating elements, and go back to the more intuitive Word 97 approach. Also, converting tables from XP to 97 is a disaster, as they are all inserted in Frames. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: In general, removing any empty paragraphs between the tables should suffice. Make sure the tables are not wrapped (wrapping is set to None). -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Loretta" wrote in message ... I have a form that I used OCR on first...now I need to make a few seperate small tables (same size) ONE table...does anyone know if that possible? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Loretta,
OCR programs create weird documents, too. Wouldn't surprise me at all if they create floating tables. You should be able to turn them into "inline" tables with the macro below. They will likely move around though, so you may need to do a bit of editing to make the document look nice again. Dim myTable As Table For Each myTable In ActiveDocument.Tables myTable.Rows.WrapAroundText = False Next myTable (See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/MacrosVBA/CreateAMacro.htm for help on macros) Regards, Klaus "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Tables should not be wrapped (and therefore should not be converted to framed tables in Word 97) unless the user has so specified. But (a) it's all too easy to nudge a table the least bit (using the table handle) in Print Layout view, thereby making it wrapped (working in Normal view is therefore safer), and (b) tables imported from the Web are an entirely different animal. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
.....means the document text wraps around the table, not that the text in the
cell wraps? Oh boy...I hope they bring the ? back (what's this)... "Klaus Linke" wrote: Hi Loretta, OCR programs create weird documents, too. Wouldn't surprise me at all if they create floating tables. You should be able to turn them into "inline" tables with the macro below. They will likely move around though, so you may need to do a bit of editing to make the document look nice again. Dim myTable As Table For Each myTable In ActiveDocument.Tables myTable.Rows.WrapAroundText = False Next myTable (See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/MacrosVBA/CreateAMacro.htm for help on macros) Regards, Klaus "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Tables should not be wrapped (and therefore should not be converted to framed tables in Word 97) unless the user has so specified. But (a) it's all too easy to nudge a table the least bit (using the table handle) in Print Layout view, thereby making it wrapped (working in Normal view is therefore safer), and (b) tables imported from the Web are an entirely different animal. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In typing dates in Word, i.e. "January 12" how do you keep the "1. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
word xp crashes after macros are recorded | Microsoft Word Help | |||
WP Delay Code - Word Equiv | Microsoft Word Help | |||
macro in word | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Merging tables in Word 2003 | Microsoft Word Help |