Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
Field codes: MergeField field RTF format problem
Yeah, I figured it was going to be a fun problem. I'm going to contact
Microsoft and try to get an explanation for the change from Word 2000. I'm working on an application that prints RTF files using the riched20.dll and I have complaints that it doesn't print the same as Word 2003. It seems that Word 2003 has special logic to detect this change which I'd rather not have to implement. I'm trying to get an explanation or configuration change for Word 2003 rather than implement a heuristic to remove the \sectd directly after the \field RTF block before sending the RTF to the printer. I really don't want to take that route, since it seems a little hackarific. Thanks for the help though! I'm glad to know it wasn't something simple that I had overlooked! I'll post a solution if I do get one. Otherwise assume I did the heuristic. Haha. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Can you remove words from a mergefield using field codes? | Mailmerge | |||
Saving word document with field results not field codes | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Use Mergefield within text in if-field | Mailmerge | |||
Mergefield Two Dates One Field | Mailmerge | |||
Imbedded MERGEFIELD in IF/ELSE/THEN field | Mailmerge |