| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
Hi,
A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks! |
|
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes??
You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18*pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. *How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks! |
|
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
Hi,
You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks! |
|
#4
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by
default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks! |
|
#5
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. However, I was surprised,
and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks! |
|
#6
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
I also would be (pleasantly) surprised; I had never thought about this
before, and pace the Chicago Manual, I do sometimes footnote headings: it's not uncommon in the case of a footnote acknowledging the source of material in a given section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. However, I was surprised, and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks! |
|
#7
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
Tsk, tsk. Source footnotes are unnumbered notes on the first page of
the chapter -- even if the rest of the notes are endnotes. On May 6, 11:58*am, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: I also would be (pleasantly) surprised; I had never thought about this before, and pace the Chicago Manual, I do sometimes footnote headings: it's not uncommon in the case of a footnote acknowledging the source of material in a given section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. *However, I was surprised, and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: *A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. *But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". *I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. *How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks!- |
|
#8
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
Not necessarily. Sometimes only a very specific section of a document is
attributed to someone else. "I am indebted to x for providing y," or "I would like to thank my friend x for suggesting the approach taken in this section," or whatever. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "grammatim" wrote in message ... Tsk, tsk. Source footnotes are unnumbered notes on the first page of the chapter -- even if the rest of the notes are endnotes. On May 6, 11:58 am, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: I also would be (pleasantly) surprised; I had never thought about this before, and pace the Chicago Manual, I do sometimes footnote headings: it's not uncommon in the case of a footnote acknowledging the source of material in a given section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. However, I was surprised, and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks!- |
|
#9
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
That belongs in the Acknowledgments in the front of the book (I don't
think Chicago has succumbed to the recent practice of putting Acknowledgments in the back); if it's unavoidable to put it in a chapter, the note still doesn't go on a heading, but on the first sentence of the text. (I've been editing for the U of C Press since 1984, including several years as a full-time employee ...) On May 6, 7:26*pm, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Not necessarily. Sometimes only a very specific section of a document is attributed to someone else. "I am indebted to x for providing y," or "I would like to thank my friend x for suggesting the approach taken in this section," or whatever. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "grammatim" wrote in message ... Tsk, tsk. Source footnotes are unnumbered notes on the first page of the chapter -- even if the rest of the notes are endnotes. On May 6, 11:58 am, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: I also would be (pleasantly) surprised; I had never thought about this before, and pace the Chicago Manual, I do sometimes footnote headings: it's not uncommon in the case of a footnote acknowledging the source of material in a given section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. However, I was surprised, and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks!-- |
|
#10
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
We're not necessarily talking about a book. It could be a consulting report
or something that has nothing as formal as acknowledgments. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "grammatim" wrote in message ... That belongs in the Acknowledgments in the front of the book (I don't think Chicago has succumbed to the recent practice of putting Acknowledgments in the back); if it's unavoidable to put it in a chapter, the note still doesn't go on a heading, but on the first sentence of the text. (I've been editing for the U of C Press since 1984, including several years as a full-time employee ...) On May 6, 7:26 pm, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Not necessarily. Sometimes only a very specific section of a document is attributed to someone else. "I am indebted to x for providing y," or "I would like to thank my friend x for suggesting the approach taken in this section," or whatever. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "grammatim" wrote in message ... Tsk, tsk. Source footnotes are unnumbered notes on the first page of the chapter -- even if the rest of the notes are endnotes. On May 6, 11:58 am, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: I also would be (pleasantly) surprised; I had never thought about this before, and pace the Chicago Manual, I do sometimes footnote headings: it's not uncommon in the case of a footnote acknowledging the source of material in a given section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. However, I was surprised, and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks!-- |
|
#11
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
|
Urgent - How can I hide a footnote from the TOC?
But it has a ToC ... (and the note in question probably isn't an
acknowledgments note). On May 7, 1:02*am, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: We're not necessarily talking about a book. It could be a consulting report or something that has nothing as formal as acknowledgments. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "grammatim" wrote in message ... That belongs in the Acknowledgments in the front of the book (I don't think Chicago has succumbed to the recent practice of putting Acknowledgments in the back); if it's unavoidable to put it in a chapter, the note still doesn't go on a heading, but on the first sentence of the text. (I've been editing for the U of C Press since 1984, including several years as a full-time employee ...) On May 6, 7:26 pm, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Not necessarily. Sometimes only a very specific section of a document is attributed to someone else. "I am indebted to x for providing y," or "I would like to thank my friend x for suggesting the approach taken in this section," or whatever. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "grammatim" wrote in message ... Tsk, tsk. Source footnotes are unnumbered notes on the first page of the chapter -- even if the rest of the notes are endnotes. On May 6, 11:58 am, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: I also would be (pleasantly) surprised; I had never thought about this before, and pace the Chicago Manual, I do sometimes footnote headings: it's not uncommon in the case of a footnote acknowledging the source of material in a given section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... I guess it was because it was a "real" footnote. However, I was surprised, and relieved, that this FootnoteReference style did the trick. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: The Footnote Reference style should be applied to footnote references by default. Was this footnote inserted using Insert | Reference | Footnote? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA "Helen" wrote in message ... Hi, You are right: A footnote should never be in a heading, however, the user insisted. But, finally, I found out that in the Styles panel, there's a style called "Footnote;Reference". I applied it to the footnote in the heading and it did not show up in the TOC. Helene "grammatim" wrote: Doesn't that throw off the numbering of all the footnotes?? You could manually delete the footnote from the ToC (but it will reappear each time you regenerate the ToC). You could format it as Hidden. You could show your user where the Chicago Manual of Style says that footnotes are NEVER hung from displayed material (such as headings). On May 5, 5:18 pm, Helen wrote: Hi, A user here insists in adding a footnote to a heading; then, same heading is part of the TOC, along with the footnote number. How can I hide the footnote number in the TOC? Word 2003. Thanks!--- |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| URGENT URGENT - Textbox seems linked to drawing object. | Tables | |||
| URGENT URGENT - Textbox seems linked to drawing object. | Page Layout | |||
| Urgent! How to change a symbol footnote to numbers? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
| TOC field codes will not hide when commanded by HIDE/SHOW tile. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
| How do I hide footnote numbers in text, but keep end notes visible | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Linear Mode
