Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been expermenting with mail merge and have come across a problem. I
am using and Excel table as my data source. When I choose the merge output to be an email the emails are sent automatically without me being able to check it. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would suggest that you find a way to stop your e-ail package from sending
automatically, and do that before each erge to e-ail. Then check the e-ails in the Outbox, then switch on sending again. The trouble is, Ihave never found a particularly easy way to do that in Outlook, but perhaps soeone else here knows soething that works in all versions, or you ight find the answer in an Outlook group. Also, I've never found an easy way to disable sending teporarily /in code/. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? I do not think this is likely to help (because even sending the e-mails one at a time, they will still be transmitted immediately unless you can switch off or delay transmission) unless the macro you write is in two parts, e.g. a. one macro produces one output file for each e-mail (see examples in this newsgroup for macro code to do this) b. you inspect the output files c. a second phase then takes the output files and e-mails them However, even in that case, you do not necessarily get to check the e-mails in exactly the same forat that they are sent. Peter Jamieson "roskasara" wrote in message ... I have been expermenting with mail merge and have come across a problem. I am using and Excel table as my data source. When I choose the merge output to be an email the emails are sent automatically without me being able to check it. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One way I found of doing it was to go offline - either disconnecting you
network cable or dial up... .... not very elegant, I'll grant you ![]() "Peter Jamieson" wrote: I would suggest that you find a way to stop your e-ail package from sending automatically, and do that before each erge to e-ail. Then check the e-ails in the Outbox, then switch on sending again. The trouble is, Ihave never found a particularly easy way to do that in Outlook, but perhaps soeone else here knows soething that works in all versions, or you ight find the answer in an Outlook group. Also, I've never found an easy way to disable sending teporarily /in code/. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? I do not think this is likely to help (because even sending the e-mails one at a time, they will still be transmitted immediately unless you can switch off or delay transmission) unless the macro you write is in two parts, e.g. a. one macro produces one output file for each e-mail (see examples in this newsgroup for macro code to do this) b. you inspect the output files c. a second phase then takes the output files and e-mails them However, even in that case, you do not necessarily get to check the e-mails in exactly the same forat that they are sent. Peter Jamieson "roskasara" wrote in message ... I have been expermenting with mail merge and have come across a problem. I am using and Excel table as my data source. When I choose the merge output to be an email the emails are sent automatically without me being able to check it. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With Outlook - tools options mail setup send & receive - uncheck 'send
immediately when connected'. Messages will collect in the outbox. In fact it is not a bad plan to leave it like this and use send & receive to send and receive all e-mails. We have all sent e-mails that we didn't mean to send ![]() -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Peter Jamieson wrote: I would suggest that you find a way to stop your e-ail package from sending automatically, and do that before each erge to e-ail. Then check the e-ails in the Outbox, then switch on sending again. The trouble is, Ihave never found a particularly easy way to do that in Outlook, but perhaps soeone else here knows soething that works in all versions, or you ight find the answer in an Outlook group. Also, I've never found an easy way to disable sending teporarily /in code/. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? I do not think this is likely to help (because even sending the e-mails one at a time, they will still be transmitted immediately unless you can switch off or delay transmission) unless the macro you write is in two parts, e.g. a. one macro produces one output file for each e-mail (see examples in this newsgroup for macro code to do this) b. you inspect the output files c. a second phase then takes the output files and e-mails them However, even in that case, you do not necessarily get to check the e-mails in exactly the same forat that they are sent. Peter Jamieson "roskasara" wrote in message ... I have been expermenting with mail merge and have come across a problem. I am using and Excel table as my data source. When I choose the merge output to be an email the emails are sent automatically without me being able to check it. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the tips - I have come to the conclusion that stopping my email
programme sending automatically is my best option. I will just have to remember to do it before I send out 1000 of emails with really bad typos "Peter Jamieson" wrote: I would suggest that you find a way to stop your e-ail package from sending automatically, and do that before each erge to e-ail. Then check the e-ails in the Outbox, then switch on sending again. The trouble is, Ihave never found a particularly easy way to do that in Outlook, but perhaps soeone else here knows soething that works in all versions, or you ight find the answer in an Outlook group. Also, I've never found an easy way to disable sending teporarily /in code/. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? I do not think this is likely to help (because even sending the e-mails one at a time, they will still be transmitted immediately unless you can switch off or delay transmission) unless the macro you write is in two parts, e.g. a. one macro produces one output file for each e-mail (see examples in this newsgroup for macro code to do this) b. you inspect the output files c. a second phase then takes the output files and e-mails them However, even in that case, you do not necessarily get to check the e-mails in exactly the same forat that they are sent. Peter Jamieson "roskasara" wrote in message ... I have been expermenting with mail merge and have come across a problem. I am using and Excel table as my data source. When I choose the merge output to be an email the emails are sent automatically without me being able to check it. I have a feeling that the answer may be a macro. Am I right? and if so what macro do I need to write? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sending Mail Merge to Email to Multiple Recipients in the Same Mes | Mailmerge | |||
Is there a quantity limit of pieces that can be Mail Merged & Prin | Mailmerge | |||
How do I email a mail merged document? | Mailmerge | |||
how do i stop auto recovery of the documents | New Users | |||
Mail Merged records need to go to SEPARATE documents | Mailmerge |