Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which Word 2003 table creation and formatting methods are still stable?
I'm now experiencing those wonderful table problems, since I experimented with Table Autoformat before I read the past month's discussions on the conflict between modified Normal style, custom styles applied to tables, and Autoformat Table Styles. Here's what I think I learned: Never use: Draw Table, Table Autoformat, or Microsoft's Table Styles (until Microsoft fixes these functions) Still stable: Insert Table and Convert Text to Table (no Table | Autoformat). For tables created by these methods, the end of row style is Table Grid, even though the Convert dialog box says: "Table style: (none)." Doesn't matter what style the table is inserted into, other than for ease of formatting; that style is the table's initial style for each cell. Custom styles work as defined in these tables. Doesn't matter if Normal has been modified or if custom styles are based on Normal (mine are not). Don't understand: when/how to use Table Normal style? This style was mentioned in some of the discussions as useful, without any further explanation. To fix bad tables: convert to text, then back to tables, and then update the document's style definitions. Also delete any Microsoft Table Styles from the document and template. Do I have to convert all tables in the document, or just those that aren't Table Grid? Is there anything else I need to do to ensure that tables work reliably? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how to convert wordperfect 5.0 floppy files to word | Microsoft Word Help | |||
how can you create quickwords in MS Office Word 2003 | Microsoft Word Help | |||
copying files from Wordperfect to Microsoft Word | New Users | |||
Converted document from WordPerfect. New footnotes are not being. | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Word 2003 Table AutoFormat vs Macro vs VBA | Tables |