Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
Fewer normal template problems with Word 2000 or 2002?
I have enjoyed some things about Word 2007, but I keep having problems
with macros and templates. I am wondering if (a) macros increase the likelihood of corrupting the normal template in 2007, or (b) if the older versions of Word had as many template problems. I have used Word in 2000, with Office 2003, and now with Office 2007 and I don't ever recall having as many problems as I've had with 2007. What I'm thinking is that if it is simply a macro problem causing corruption, I would simply use 2007 without the macros (they're nice but I can live without them). On the other hand, if the 2007 template is just gonna corrupt regardless, I can try older versions (I still have CDs for them)--unless, of course, the normal template has always been corruptible. If the answer to both (a) and (b) is "yes," is there any other workaround? Can one open word from another template--could I make one based on the normal, rename it, then have Word open that? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fewer normal template problems with Word 2000 or 2002? | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Word 2002 problems | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Problems with Normal.dot in Word 2000 | New Users | |||
MS Word should let me print an envelope from MS Outlook in fewer . | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Problems with Global Template normal.dot it is always open and af. | Microsoft Word Help |