Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I'm now writing my Master of Science Thesis and till now I used Master and Subdocuments for it (all chapters in separate subdocuments). Today I've come accross several articles that I must say frightened me, saying that there are major problems with Master documents (on word.MVPS.Org site). So if there are such problems with them what should I do now? How to write a long scientific document with loads of equations, figures, bibliography cross-references. If I keep it all in one document and it becomes larger than 30 pages (with many equations) work with it becomes very unpleasent ![]() What are other methods of handling large scientific documents without the problem considering corrupted master documents? -- Wojtek Kurek |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What version of Word?
Here's a link to one expert's suggestions on safely using Master Documents: Steve Hudson [Word Heretic] on how to make Master Documents work safely: http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ma...dhomepage.html However, and I don't know enough about Windows to be sure, a document becoming unpleasantly slow after 30 pages, even with figures and equations, suggests there might be something else going on with your setup. On 4/16/05 6:12 AM, "Qreg" wrote: Hello, I'm now writing my Master of Science Thesis and till now I used Master and Subdocuments for it (all chapters in separate subdocuments). Today I've come accross several articles that I must say frightened me, saying that there are major problems with Master documents (on word.MVPS.Org site). So if there are such problems with them what should I do now? How to write a long scientific document with loads of equations, figures, bibliography cross-references. If I keep it all in one document and it becomes larger than 30 pages (with many equations) work with it becomes very unpleasent ![]() What are other methods of handling large scientific documents without the problem considering corrupted master documents? -- Wojtek Kurek -- Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/ MacWord Tips: http://www.word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/ What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dnia Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:12:23 -0700, Daiya Mitchell napisał(a):
What version of Word? Here's a link to one expert's suggestions on safely using Master Documents: Steve Hudson [Word Heretic] on how to make Master Documents work safely: http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ma...dhomepage.html However, and I don't know enough about Windows to be sure, a document becoming unpleasantly slow after 30 pages, even with figures and equations, suggests there might be something else going on with your setup. On 4/16/05 6:12 AM, "Qreg" wrote: Hello, I'm now writing my Master of Science Thesis and till now I used Master and Subdocuments for it (all chapters in separate subdocuments). Today I've come accross several articles that I must say frightened me, saying that there are major problems with Master documents (on word.MVPS.Org site). So if there are such problems with them what should I do now? How to write a long scientific document with loads of equations, figures, bibliography cross-references. If I keep it all in one document and it becomes larger than 30 pages (with many equations) work with it becomes very unpleasent ![]() What are other methods of handling large scientific documents without the problem considering corrupted master documents? Thank You for that link, I've already read it before posting ![]() of the reasons why I decided to ask profesionals about that matter, and how to avoid future problem (as now I still have some time to change few things in my project). Maybe that number of 30 pages is a little to low but believe me when the number of equations is getting larger the more problems occur (unfortunatelly I cannot convert them to images at that point because first it has to be checked by my Profesor, who has to have possibility of editing them if it is neccesary). So for now I'll stick to Steve Hudson's tips on how to work with master documents, but I'm still looking for another solutions to the problem (that is different from using LaTeX ![]() Thanks again for Your answer -- Wojtek Kurek |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Qreg
Qreg wrote: Maybe that number of 30 pages is a little to low but believe me when the number of equations is getting larger the more problems occur (unfortunatelly I cannot convert them to images at that point because first it has to be checked by my Profesor, who has to have possibility of editing them if it is neccesary). MathType (an extension to Word's built-in Equation Editor) might be of some help to you. Since we use that at my Uni, problems with Equations have dropped considerably. I recall a rather short document in Word 97 (you seem to be rather reluctant to name the version _you_ are using ...) where I could almost feel the difference after each insertion of a new EqEdit-Object. I had to recreate way too many of those objects time and again (and after editing like 5, I had to save, close and reopen the document anyway if I wanted to edit another one ...). I don't want to advocate LaTeX since I've never sensibly used it myself, but for documents with a lot of equations, I'd seriously consider it. When you use a standard LaTeX package, you lose a lot of flexibility (unless you _really_ go deep into the specs) for the price of a decent layout. 2cents Robert -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | MS \ / | MVP X Against HTML | for / \ in e-mail & news | Word |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Qreg" wrote in message ... Hello, I'm now writing my Master of Science Thesis and till now I used Master and Subdocuments for it (all chapters in separate subdocuments). Today I've come accross several articles that I must say frightened me, saying that there are major problems with Master documents (on word.MVPS.Org site). So if there are such problems with them what should I do now? How to write a long scientific document with loads of equations, figures, bibliography cross-references. If I keep it all in one document and it becomes larger than 30 pages (with many equations) work with it becomes very unpleasent ![]() What are other methods of handling large scientific documents without the problem considering corrupted master documents? -- Wojtek Kurek Hi Wojtek These two articles may help How to recover a Master Document http://www.word.mvps.org/FAQs/Genera...MasterDocs.htm Creating a Table of Contents Spanning Multiple Documents http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/P...cle.asp?ID=148 -- Regards Jonathan West - Word MVP www.intelligentdocuments.co.uk Please reply to the newsgroup Keep your VBA code safe, sign the ClassicVB petition www.classicvb.org |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() MathType (an extension to Word's built-in Equation Editor) might be of some help to you. Since we use that at my Uni, problems with Equations have dropped considerably. I'm now started the trial period for MathType 5.2 and if it helps then I'll upgrade. I recall a rather short document in Word 97 (you seem to be rather reluctant to name the version _you_ are using ...) Sorry for that, I use word 2003. to recreate way too many of those objects time and again (and after editing like 5, I had to save, close and reopen the document anyway if I wanted to edit another one ...). Well in my case it is not so drastic, but word slows noticeably (even with 768 MB of Ram onboard). I don't want to advocate LaTeX since I've never sensibly used it myself, but for documents with a lot of equations, I'd seriously consider it. I wanted to write it in LaTeX, but the problem there is that not everybody can edit LaTeX documents (more knowledge is needed) and the main issue is that my Profesor uses don't know it. When you use a standard LaTeX package, you lose a lot of flexibility (unless you _really_ go deep into the specs) for the price of a decent layout. Yeah, You can always tell when a document was writen with LaTeX from its looks ![]() use and the quality of documents. So for now I'll evaluate MathType and stick to Word Heretic's advices on working with Master Documents, and in the mean time still look for better solutions. -- Wojtek Kurek |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17-Apr-2005, Qreg wrote:
Yeah, You can always tell when a document was writen with LaTeX from its looks ![]() trade-off between the ease of use and the quality of documents. If you want your Word document to have a LaTeX look, use Euclid font for your text, and in MathType set your styles (Style Define) to use Euclid font as your Primary font, and use Euclid Symbol and Euclid Extra as your Greek and Extra Math fonts. (The Euclid fonts are part of the MathType installation.) -- Bob Mathews Director of Training 830-990-9699 http://www.dessci.com/free.asp?free=news FREE fully-functional 30-day evaluation of MathType 5 Design Science, Inc. -- "How Science Communicates" MathType, WebEQ, MathPlayer, MathFlow, Equation Editor, TeXaide |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Wojtek
Qreg wrote: I don't want to advocate LaTeX since I've never sensibly used it myself, but for documents with a lot of equations, I'd seriously consider it. I wanted to write it in LaTeX, but the problem there is that not everybody can edit LaTeX documents (more knowledge is needed) and the main issue is that my Profesor uses don't know it. I see what you mean. Just make sure that your professor knows how to use Word. Make sure he doesn't use AutoFormatAsYouType options that you don't like beeing used on that file. Yeah, You can always tell when a document was writen with LaTeX from its looks ![]() Unless someone was handling LaTeX badly: I've seen _such_ documents, too! But I think that Word offers decent trade-off between the ease of use and the quality of documents. Yes it does, for some types of documents in any case. Just don't expect every user who "knows Word beceause he's written a letter before" to be able to handle your document. At least not if you value your document! So for now I'll evaluate MathType and stick to Word Heretic's advices on working with Master Documents, and in the mean time still look for better solutions. Then make sure your professor does edit the Subdocuments only. Don't give them access to the master! Greetinx Robert -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | MS \ / | MVP X Against HTML | for / \ in e-mail & news | Word |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I see what you mean. Just make sure that your professor knows how to use Word. Make sure he doesn't use AutoFormatAsYouType options that you don't like beeing used on that file. Some thing are beyond our power to influance. Yes it does, for some types of documents in any case. Just don't expect every user who "knows Word beceause he's written a letter before" to be able to handle your document. At least not if you value your document! Well in my opinion most people doesnt really need word, wordpad would do just right for them ![]() ![]() Then make sure your professor does edit the Subdocuments only. Don't give them access to the master! Well I'm planning for Him to see the master only once ![]() -- Wojtek Kurek |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/17/05 3:32 PM, "Qreg" wrote:
MathType (an extension to Word's built-in Equation Editor) might be of some help to you. Since we use that at my Uni, problems with Equations have dropped considerably. I'm now started the trial period for MathType 5.2 and if it helps then I'll upgrade. If you create your equations in MathType, your professor will also need MathType or MathType Lite to edit the equations. MathType Lite is what you get after you let the demo program expire, so free. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If you create your equations in MathType, your professor will also need MathType or MathType Lite to edit the equations. MathType Lite is what you get after you let the demo program expire, so free. Thank You for bringing this problem up. ![]() -- Wojtek Kurek |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If you create your equations in MathType, your professor will also need MathType or MathType Lite to edit the equations. MathType Lite is what you get after you let the demo program expire, so free. Thank You for bringing this problem up. ![]() But I should also have said that the Design Science people, who make all these programs, still consider MT Lite to be a better and more stable program than Equation Editor. MT and MT Lite also create cross-platform win/Mac equations while Equation Editor does not. DMs |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Very long document | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Problems with long word document | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Resources for Long Document Management | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Text cut off in merged document when very long field data | Mailmerge | |||
How can I prevent a long document changing when opened on other c. | Page Layout |