Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am merging an Access 2000 parameter query into a Word 2000 form letter.
Everything seems fine, except only 4 of the 7 records I've filtered for are showing up--Only the odd-numbered records. I have another form letter linked to this query and my OS is XP, if that has any relevance. The query is fine--it's the only reason I knew I wasn't getting all of my (7) results in my mail merge document. When I run the mail merge, I have "all records" checked to merge. Aaaand-I've checked my filters in the mail merge helper: all blank. I can get the even records to merge if I select to merge records 2 through 7 (or last record, I suppose). This is a bit annoying, though, and I abhor tedium. I really want to know WHY! If anyone has run into this before, I'd appreciate a solution. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you have any { NEXT } ( Next record ) fields in your mail merge main
document? If so, you may have one more than you need. Peter Jamieson "helios" wrote in message ... I am merging an Access 2000 parameter query into a Word 2000 form letter. Everything seems fine, except only 4 of the 7 records I've filtered for are showing up--Only the odd-numbered records. I have another form letter linked to this query and my OS is XP, if that has any relevance. The query is fine--it's the only reason I knew I wasn't getting all of my (7) results in my mail merge document. When I run the mail merge, I have "all records" checked to merge. Aaaand-I've checked my filters in the mail merge helper: all blank. I can get the even records to merge if I select to merge records 2 through 7 (or last record, I suppose). This is a bit annoying, though, and I abhor tedium. I really want to know WHY! If anyone has run into this before, I'd appreciate a solution. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't I feel silly now. I did have one Next Record, and as soon as I
deleted it, all of my records merged. I should have tried that earlier. Now my question is: is there a hidden or automatic Next Record command that I'm missing? I've deleted the only one I inserted. Thank you, Peter. "Peter Jamieson" wrote: Do you have any { NEXT } ( Next record ) fields in your mail merge main document? If so, you may have one more than you need. Peter Jamieson "helios" wrote in message ... I am merging an Access 2000 parameter query into a Word 2000 form letter. Everything seems fine, except only 4 of the 7 records I've filtered for are showing up--Only the odd-numbered records. I have another form letter linked to this query and my OS is XP, if that has any relevance. The query is fine--it's the only reason I knew I wasn't getting all of my (7) results in my mail merge document. When I run the mail merge, I have "all records" checked to merge. Aaaand-I've checked my filters in the mail merge helper: all blank. I can get the even records to merge if I select to merge records 2 through 7 (or last record, I suppose). This is a bit annoying, though, and I abhor tedium. I really want to know WHY! If anyone has run into this before, I'd appreciate a solution. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's an automatic one - I like to think of the process as being:
a. Word makes a copy of the mail merge main document, and processes all the fields in it until it reaches the end, moving to the Next record whenever there is a NEXT or an appropriate NEXTIF and so on. b. If there are any more records, Word moves to the next record and does (a) again. Peter Jamieson "helios" wrote in message ... Don't I feel silly now. I did have one Next Record, and as soon as I deleted it, all of my records merged. I should have tried that earlier. Now my question is: is there a hidden or automatic Next Record command that I'm missing? I've deleted the only one I inserted. Thank you, Peter. "Peter Jamieson" wrote: Do you have any { NEXT } ( Next record ) fields in your mail merge main document? If so, you may have one more than you need. Peter Jamieson "helios" wrote in message ... I am merging an Access 2000 parameter query into a Word 2000 form letter. Everything seems fine, except only 4 of the 7 records I've filtered for are showing up--Only the odd-numbered records. I have another form letter linked to this query and my OS is XP, if that has any relevance. The query is fine--it's the only reason I knew I wasn't getting all of my (7) results in my mail merge document. When I run the mail merge, I have "all records" checked to merge. Aaaand-I've checked my filters in the mail merge helper: all blank. I can get the even records to merge if I select to merge records 2 through 7 (or last record, I suppose). This is a bit annoying, though, and I abhor tedium. I really want to know WHY! If anyone has run into this before, I'd appreciate a solution. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helios- How did u accomplish this query / mailmerge ... I have been trying to
get that exact tthing done for three days now . what is your code ? "helios" wrote: I am merging an Access 2000 parameter query into a Word 2000 form letter. Everything seems fine, except only 4 of the 7 records I've filtered for are showing up--Only the odd-numbered records. I have another form letter linked to this query and my OS is XP, if that has any relevance. The query is fine--it's the only reason I knew I wasn't getting all of my (7) results in my mail merge document. When I run the mail merge, I have "all records" checked to merge. Aaaand-I've checked my filters in the mail merge helper: all blank. I can get the even records to merge if I select to merge records 2 through 7 (or last record, I suppose). This is a bit annoying, though, and I abhor tedium. I really want to know WHY! If anyone has run into this before, I'd appreciate a solution. |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sounds like he probably has a Next Record field in the mail merge
main document where it is not required. If that is the case, it will cause every second record to be skipped so that you would only get records 1, 3, 5 and 7 in the result of the merge. -- Hope this helps. Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my services on a paid consulting basis. Doug Robbins - Word MVP "HelloWorld" wrote in message ... Helios- How did u accomplish this query / mailmerge ... I have been trying to get that exact tthing done for three days now . what is your code ? "helios" wrote: I am merging an Access 2000 parameter query into a Word 2000 form letter. Everything seems fine, except only 4 of the 7 records I've filtered for are showing up--Only the odd-numbered records. I have another form letter linked to this query and my OS is XP, if that has any relevance. The query is fine--it's the only reason I knew I wasn't getting all of my (7) results in my mail merge document. When I run the mail merge, I have "all records" checked to merge. Aaaand-I've checked my filters in the mail merge helper: all blank. I can get the even records to merge if I select to merge records 2 through 7 (or last record, I suppose). This is a bit annoying, though, and I abhor tedium. I really want to know WHY! If anyone has run into this before, I'd appreciate a solution. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to use access query computed fields in Word mailmerge | Mailmerge | |||
New problem - merge Word 2002 and Access 2002 par query | Mailmerge | |||
Getting a Parameter to work in Microsoft Query | Mailmerge | |||
MailMerge Word 2003 to Access 2000 query blank data | Mailmerge | |||
Mailmerge data source in an Access database will not open | Mailmerge |