Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted
with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex as that way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can do the second set of page numbers using a calculation field --
{ = { PAGE } - n } Where n is the number of the first annex page minus 1. Or even swisher, add a bookmark for the start of the annex, and use { = { PageRef "AnnexBookmark" } - 1 } ... then the annex numbering will update if you add or remove pages from the body. Can't think of a way to get those numbers into your second table of contents, however. "Jerry" wrote in message ... I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex as that way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I asked the same question today but with a slightly different twist. I used
your calculation suggestion and got it to work. But I need the first few pages in roman numerals. How do I format that within the field? "Jezebel" wrote: You can do the second set of page numbers using a calculation field -- { = { PAGE } - n } Where n is the number of the first annex page minus 1. Or even swisher, add a bookmark for the start of the annex, and use { = { PageRef "AnnexBookmark" } - 1 } ... then the annex numbering will update if you add or remove pages from the body. Can't think of a way to get those numbers into your second table of contents, however. "Jerry" wrote in message ... I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex as that way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can add the \*roman switch to the PAGE field. I think probably the TOC
doesn't pick that up, either, though. The only way to do this so that Word picks up roman numbering is through Format Page Number, which would apply to all the page numbers in the section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JayWomack" wrote in message ... I asked the same question today but with a slightly different twist. I used your calculation suggestion and got it to work. But I need the first few pages in roman numerals. How do I format that within the field? "Jezebel" wrote: You can do the second set of page numbers using a calculation field -- { = { PAGE } - n } Where n is the number of the first annex page minus 1. Or even swisher, add a bookmark for the start of the annex, and use { = { PageRef "AnnexBookmark" } - 1 } ... then the annex numbering will update if you add or remove pages from the body. Can't think of a way to get those numbers into your second table of contents, however. "Jerry" wrote in message ... I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex as that way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
This is a related question to this thread: Can I have multiple TOCs within the same document? e.g. I have 5 chapters, each having 2 sub-chapters. I would like a TOC at the beginning of each chapter that only shows the 2 sub-chapters in that chapter. (I will do away with the page numbering under Options.) Thank you. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: You can add the \*roman switch to the PAGE field. I think probably the TOC doesn't pick that up, either, though. The only way to do this so that Word picks up roman numbering is through Format Page Number, which would apply to all the page numbers in the section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JayWomack" wrote in message ... I asked the same question today but with a slightly different twist. I used your calculation suggestion and got it to work. But I need the first few pages in roman numerals. How do I format that within the field? "Jezebel" wrote: You can do the second set of page numbers using a calculation field -- { = { PAGE } - n } Where n is the number of the first annex page minus 1. Or even swisher, add a bookmark for the start of the annex, and use { = { PageRef "AnnexBookmark" } - 1 } ... then the annex numbering will update if you add or remove pages from the body. Can't think of a way to get those numbers into your second table of contents, however. "Jerry" wrote in message ... I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex as that way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See the "A partial table of contents" section in the article at
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/formatting/TOCSwitches.htm. -- Stefan Blom Microsoft Word MVP "Melissa" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, This is a related question to this thread: Can I have multiple TOCs within the same document? e.g. I have 5 chapters, each having 2 sub-chapters. I would like a TOC at the beginning of each chapter that only shows the 2 sub-chapters in that chapter. (I will do away with the page numbering under Options.) Thank you. "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: You can add the \*roman switch to the PAGE field. I think probably the TOC doesn't pick that up, either, though. The only way to do this so that Word picks up roman numbering is through Format Page Number, which would apply to all the page numbers in the section. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "JayWomack" wrote in message ... I asked the same question today but with a slightly different twist. I used your calculation suggestion and got it to work. But I need the first few pages in roman numerals. How do I format that within the field? "Jezebel" wrote: You can do the second set of page numbers using a calculation field -- { = { PAGE } - n } Where n is the number of the first annex page minus 1. Or even swisher, add a bookmark for the start of the annex, and use { = { PageRef "AnnexBookmark" } - 1 } ... then the annex numbering will update if you add or remove pages from the body. Can't think of a way to get those numbers into your second table of contents, however. "Jerry" wrote in message ... I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex as that way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the help. It at least measn I do not have to paginate each page
separately, I can (of course) do thye secondary TOC manually as that is unlikely to change once I have it in. "Jerry" wrote: I am preparing a large (300+page) document that has 50+ page Annex reprinted with permission from the other author. I want the Annex to have two sets of page numbers, one straight through from 1-300+, and the other from 1-50. I need two Tables of Contents, one for the whole document the other just for the Annex ashat way I can replicate that document. The only difference then between the Aneex and its original will be in the Header. Can I have two sets of page numbers and then generate two different tables of contents? I can obviously do it by "faking" the second set of page numbers in the Annex by manually putting the numbers on a second line of the header and preparing the second TOC manually, but that seems a bit clunky. Is there a better way???? -- Jerry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Incorrect Page Numbers when printing | Microsoft Word Help | |||
page numbers & TOC | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Word 2003 printing {PAGE} instead of page numbers | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Problem with Page Numbers in Index using Word 2002 | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Wrong Page Numbers in Table of Contents | Microsoft Word Help |