Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just noticed what something about footnote styles that I find confusing
and am wondering if anyone has an explanation. The "Footnote reference" style appears to be used for two situations. (1) for the inserted numeric reference inside the body of the document, and (2) for the matching numeric reference inside the footnote pane. What's confusing to me is that the font size in both instances is different, yet they are both defined with the same style name. Furthermore, if you modify the "Footnote reference" style definition by changing the font size to say 9pt, this then seems to change not only the font size of the reference number in the body of the document, it also changes the font size of the reference in the footnote pane. I'm wondering a couple of things: (i) why doesn't the footnote reference in the body of the document have its own style name and definition separate from that of the footnote reference in the footnote pane? (ii) Assuming there's a good reason for using the same style name for both situations, how does one adjust the style definition of one situation without affecting the other? Thanks for any help with this. Lloyd I regularly have to troubleshoot documents with over 350 footnotes. I've noticed that footnote reference style different in text to footnote pane version |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Linking a figure number to a reference in the text | New Users | |||
Space between footnote separator and main text | Page Layout | |||
Footnote Reference style conflict | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Outline | Page Layout | |||
textbox to normal text | New Users |