Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a
non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Creating a Check Template in Word 2000
1. Open a new document in Word 2000.
Now, whenever you want to write a check using this template, open a new document based on the template by going to File New General Templates. Select the check template you just created and click OK. You can then fill in the various fields on the check by clicking on the text boxes and typing in the information. When you're ready to print, only the newly entered information will print, not the non-printable image of the check.
__________________
I am not human. I am a Microsoft Word Wizard |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although you *could* do this in Word, it would make much more sense to buy
Quicken or Money, either of which is set up to do this automatically. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote:
Although you *could* do this in Word, it would make much more sense to buy Quicken or Money, either of which is set up to do this automatically. I already use QuickBooks, but sometimes I need to print a check manually, since my bookkeeper normally writes checks. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why not just *write* it (really) manually?
-- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote: Although you *could* do this in Word, it would make much more sense to buy Quicken or Money, either of which is set up to do this automatically. I already use QuickBooks, but sometimes I need to print a check manually, since my bookkeeper normally writes checks. |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about setting up page size to suit the check (or cheque as we say here
in Australia!), scan it and insert it as a background image, then insert your type-in-data-fields over that image in the correct positioning, then remove the background (or hide it) just prior to printing?? But save it as a locked template with image showing, and save each filled cheque as a separate file for archive. Ahem, is this too simple, or did I miss something here? I am not sure in this newsgroup if/when to speak up with my simplistic ideas. Seeing something that stumps "The Great Susanne. S. Barnhill" makes me wonder if it is therefore not possible at all ![]() "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, why use simple, easy, quick, manual methods when a computer, a
template, and a few hours work messing about will do! "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message ... Why not just *write* it (really) manually? -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote: Although you *could* do this in Word, it would make much more sense to buy Quicken or Money, either of which is set up to do this automatically. I already use QuickBooks, but sometimes I need to print a check manually, since my bookkeeper normally writes checks. |
#8
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the
point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Swami wrote: What about setting up page size to suit the check (or cheque as we say here in Australia!), scan it and insert it as a background image, then insert your type-in-data-fields over that image in the correct positioning, then remove the background (or hide it) just prior to printing?? But save it as a locked template with image showing, and save each filled cheque as a separate file for archive. Ahem, is this too simple, or did I miss something here? I am not sure in this newsgroup if/when to speak up with my simplistic ideas. Seeing something that stumps "The Great Susanne. S. Barnhill" makes me wonder if it is therefore not possible at all ![]() "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#9
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh Jeezus Graham. It's true. You yanks really don't get irony or humour. I
WAS NOT ATTACKING SUZANNE for god's sake. I respect her knowledge too much for that. (I got HER joke, BTW). I was offering mcp6453 a suggestion as to how I might go about it myself and making a jocular point about time wasting on a computer and how Suzanne rarely misses a great answer to solve a problem if it can be done and .....oh forget it ..... An explanation would obviously be wasted on you. You would imagine insult where none was intended - so I'll just insult you directly. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? Rather presumptuous of you. How do YOU know how many repetitive checks the poor guy has to write. Maybe mcp6453 has good reason for wanting them laser printed instead of ink written. Just address his issue, creatively, why don't you, instead of thinking for him or putting down his idea. Let him decide how he wants to use his life on the computer. There's a lot more anal people on this NG than mcp6453. If you really want to defend commonsense, why not just wait and let Jezabel have a go at him! ( Joke Graham. Joke Jezabel, in case you're watching ![]() "Graham Mayor" wrote in message ... Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Swami wrote: What about setting up page size to suit the check (or cheque as we say here in Australia!), scan it and insert it as a background image, then insert your type-in-data-fields over that image in the correct positioning, then remove the background (or hide it) just prior to printing?? But save it as a locked template with image showing, and save each filled cheque as a separate file for archive. Ahem, is this too simple, or did I miss something here? I am not sure in this newsgroup if/when to speak up with my simplistic ideas. Seeing something that stumps "The Great Susanne. S. Barnhill" makes me wonder if it is therefore not possible at all ![]() "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#10
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ooops, you're a pom. Well, then you should know better than to miss the
Aussie sense of humour! "Graham Mayor" wrote in message ... Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Swami wrote: What about setting up page size to suit the check (or cheque as we say here in Australia!), scan it and insert it as a background image, then insert your type-in-data-fields over that image in the correct positioning, then remove the background (or hide it) just prior to printing?? But save it as a locked template with image showing, and save each filled cheque as a separate file for archive. Ahem, is this too simple, or did I miss something here? I am not sure in this newsgroup if/when to speak up with my simplistic ideas. Seeing something that stumps "The Great Susanne. S. Barnhill" makes me wonder if it is therefore not possible at all ![]() "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#11
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am neither American nor Australian.
![]() -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Swami wrote: Ooops, you're a pom. Well, then you should know better than to miss the Aussie sense of humour! "Graham Mayor" wrote in message ... Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Swami wrote: What about setting up page size to suit the check (or cheque as we say here in Australia!), scan it and insert it as a background image, then insert your type-in-data-fields over that image in the correct positioning, then remove the background (or hide it) just prior to printing?? But save it as a locked template with image showing, and save each filled cheque as a separate file for archive. Ahem, is this too simple, or did I miss something here? I am not sure in this newsgroup if/when to speak up with my simplistic ideas. Seeing something that stumps "The Great Susanne. S. Barnhill" makes me wonder if it is therefore not possible at all ![]() "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#12
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graham Mayor wrote:
Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? So it's clear that I'm not going to get any help on this matter here. Rather than writing a discourse on why I want to do this, suffice it to say that I have some other projects that, if I know a good way to accomplish this task, I would then know how to accomplish those other tasks. Yes, since I already have the pen in my hand, I could go ahead and write the check. In fact, there is nothing that I write into my computer that I cannot write with that same pen. (Actually, it would be kind of hard to post to the newsgroup with a pen.) Adobe Acrobat has functionality to facilitate this sort of task. I know how to create the fill-in form, but I don't know how to hide the background just before printing. So, I'm off to the Acrobat newsgroups. Thanks anyway. This newsgroup sure has changed. |
#13
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lighten up. It's Saturday, the weather's crap and a bit of light hearted
banter never hurt anyone. Your main problem will be with the paper handling of your printer. If you want to print cheques that tear out of a cheque book, you are likely to find that many printers will not handle the paper size. If your printer can manage it then the method suggested by our Aussie friend a while back will do the job. If the printer cannot manage it then neither Word nor Acrobat will help you. -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org mcp6453 wrote: Graham Mayor wrote: Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? So it's clear that I'm not going to get any help on this matter here. Rather than writing a discourse on why I want to do this, suffice it to say that I have some other projects that, if I know a good way to accomplish this task, I would then know how to accomplish those other tasks. Yes, since I already have the pen in my hand, I could go ahead and write the check. In fact, there is nothing that I write into my computer that I cannot write with that same pen. (Actually, it would be kind of hard to post to the newsgroup with a pen.) Adobe Acrobat has functionality to facilitate this sort of task. I know how to create the fill-in form, but I don't know how to hide the background just before printing. So, I'm off to the Acrobat newsgroups. Thanks anyway. This newsgroup sure has changed. |
#14
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have a background image you can set the print option to not print
graphics (or drawings or whatever the option says). This will only work, of course, if you have no other graphics in the document but that is probably the case with your cheque. The option is global so you would want some code in the template to switch it before printing - and switch it back afterwards but it isn't hard. SaveOption = Options.PrintDrawingObjects Options.PrintDrawingObjects = False ActiveDocument.Printout ' whatever print options you want ' Or you could use Dialogs(wdDialogFilePrint).Show Options.PrintDrawingObjects = SaveOption -- Enjoy, Tony "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Graham Mayor wrote: Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? So it's clear that I'm not going to get any help on this matter here. Rather than writing a discourse on why I want to do this, suffice it to say that I have some other projects that, if I know a good way to accomplish this task, I would then know how to accomplish those other tasks. Yes, since I already have the pen in my hand, I could go ahead and write the check. In fact, there is nothing that I write into my computer that I cannot write with that same pen. (Actually, it would be kind of hard to post to the newsgroup with a pen.) Adobe Acrobat has functionality to facilitate this sort of task. I know how to create the fill-in form, but I don't know how to hide the background just before printing. So, I'm off to the Acrobat newsgroups. Thanks anyway. This newsgroup sure has changed. |
#15
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If this is set up as a form, you can also use the "Print data only for
forms" option. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Tony Jollans" My Forename at My Surname dot com wrote in message ... If you have a background image you can set the print option to not print graphics (or drawings or whatever the option says). This will only work, of course, if you have no other graphics in the document but that is probably the case with your cheque. The option is global so you would want some code in the template to switch it before printing - and switch it back afterwards but it isn't hard. SaveOption = Options.PrintDrawingObjects Options.PrintDrawingObjects = False ActiveDocument.Printout ' whatever print options you want ' Or you could use Dialogs(wdDialogFilePrint).Show Options.PrintDrawingObjects = SaveOption -- Enjoy, Tony "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Graham Mayor wrote: Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? So it's clear that I'm not going to get any help on this matter here. Rather than writing a discourse on why I want to do this, suffice it to say that I have some other projects that, if I know a good way to accomplish this task, I would then know how to accomplish those other tasks. Yes, since I already have the pen in my hand, I could go ahead and write the check. In fact, there is nothing that I write into my computer that I cannot write with that same pen. (Actually, it would be kind of hard to post to the newsgroup with a pen.) Adobe Acrobat has functionality to facilitate this sort of task. I know how to create the fill-in form, but I don't know how to hide the background just before printing. So, I'm off to the Acrobat newsgroups. Thanks anyway. This newsgroup sure has changed. |
#16
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, whoa! Let's get back to reason and cordiality here. Thank you for all
the compliments (expressed and implied). I was not, as you put it, "stumped," and the method you propose would be what I would have suggested if I had thought it worth the time and effort to set up (not to mention my time and effort to describe the process). I should have known that Mike would not have asked for a way to do this if he had not considered it worth his time and effort. And although Mike says he has QuickBooks, it would appear that he doesn't want to use it for this purpose, probably because the checks he's writing are from an account not set up in QuickBooks. But in addition to the inherent difficulty of setting up such a form, Graham's point about the printer's paper-handling capabilities is another deterrent. If Mike doesn't want to accept your perfectly good suggested method and would prefer to take umbrage and write us all off, that's his prerogative. One factor that I do wonder about is the type of check to be printed. As Graham says, the ordinary wallet check may be too small to be printed successfully. What I would also be interested to know is whether there is a standard layout for such checks. Obviously, the checks that are used with Quicken, Money, QuickBooks, and the like are laid out in a standard form, but I believe it is necessary to buy checks created specifically for this purpose. Although ordinary wallet checks are all laid out the same in general, I do not know whether the measurements are standardized, that is, whether you could set up a form field to print on the payee line that would exactly hit that line on checks printed by different companies. All of my checks seem pretty standard, but they're also all from the same source and are the no-frills checks provided at no extra charge; fancier ones might be different, for all I know. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Swami" wrote in message ... Oh Jeezus Graham. It's true. You yanks really don't get irony or humour. I WAS NOT ATTACKING SUZANNE for god's sake. I respect her knowledge too much for that. (I got HER joke, BTW). I was offering mcp6453 a suggestion as to how I might go about it myself and making a jocular point about time wasting on a computer and how Suzanne rarely misses a great answer to solve a problem if it can be done and .....oh forget it ..... An explanation would obviously be wasted on you. You would imagine insult where none was intended - so I'll just insult you directly. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? Rather presumptuous of you. How do YOU know how many repetitive checks the poor guy has to write. Maybe mcp6453 has good reason for wanting them laser printed instead of ink written. Just address his issue, creatively, why don't you, instead of thinking for him or putting down his idea. Let him decide how he wants to use his life on the computer. There's a lot more anal people on this NG than mcp6453. If you really want to defend commonsense, why not just wait and let Jezabel have a go at him! ( Joke Graham. Joke Jezabel, in case you're watching ![]() "Graham Mayor" wrote in message ... Suzanne's point was not that it couldn't be done, but rather what was the point. Computers are supposed to make your life easier not more complicated. How much effort does it need to pick up the pen that will be used to sign the cheque and add the payee's name and amount? -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Swami wrote: What about setting up page size to suit the check (or cheque as we say here in Australia!), scan it and insert it as a background image, then insert your type-in-data-fields over that image in the correct positioning, then remove the background (or hide it) just prior to printing?? But save it as a locked template with image showing, and save each filled cheque as a separate file for archive. Ahem, is this too simple, or did I miss something here? I am not sure in this newsgroup if/when to speak up with my simplistic ideas. Seeing something that stumps "The Great Susanne. S. Barnhill" makes me wonder if it is therefore not possible at all ![]() "mcp6453" wrote in message ... Using Word 2000, is it possible to make a template that has a non-printable image of a check such that when I am typing in the document, it looks like I'm filling out a check, but when I print, only the newly entered information prints? |
#17
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote:
Although ordinary wallet checks are all laid out the same in general, I do not know whether the measurements are standardized, that is, whether you could set up a form field to print on the payee line that would exactly hit that line on checks printed by different companies. All of my checks seem pretty standard, but they're also all from the same source and are the no-frills checks provided at no extra charge; fancier ones might be different, for all I know. Cheques I have to hand from different banks suggest that while the appearance is similar the text areas are not printed to standard format. Were I to create a template for any of them (which my Epson printer would not print anyway) it could not be used with the others. -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org |
#18
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.pagelayout
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for confirming my suspicions. Although of course this still doesn't
address Mike's original question if he's trying to come up with a template to print on specific checks from a specific bank. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Graham Mayor" wrote in message ... Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote: Although ordinary wallet checks are all laid out the same in general, I do not know whether the measurements are standardized, that is, whether you could set up a form field to print on the payee line that would exactly hit that line on checks printed by different companies. All of my checks seem pretty standard, but they're also all from the same source and are the no-frills checks provided at no extra charge; fancier ones might be different, for all I know. Cheques I have to hand from different banks suggest that while the appearance is similar the text areas are not printed to standard format. Were I to create a template for any of them (which my Epson printer would not print anyway) it could not be used with the others. -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How Come? | Mailmerge | |||
How do I create a template for making a small booklet (pocket) | Page Layout | |||
help making a blank template | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Global/Master Template | New Users | |||
Letter template for making a donation | Microsoft Word Help |