Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted the following question in August 2003 and received no
responses. I'm hoping for better luck now. I am preparing documentation for a program that uses a large number of functions to manipulate stock prices. This volume contains one or at most two pages to describe each function and they are arranged in alphabetical order. There are about 240 of these functions and I wanted the TOC to look like this: ABS Return the absolute value of a number 3 ACCDISTR Calculate the Accumulation/Distribution indicator 4 ASCII Return a string containing a character specified by a value 22 BDAYS Returns the number of business days between two dates 23 and so forth. This example was keyed in by hand to avoid a text conversion from Word. The space between the end of the description and the page number includes the usual dot leader. The descriptive phrases shown do not appear in the underlying documentation, so the techniques for using manual line breaks or unusual formatting do not apply as far as I am able to determine. TC fields appeared to have some hope and I created entries like {TC "ABSReturn the absolute value of a number"}. {} was produced by Ctrl+F9 and represents the tab symbol. I was unable to format the tab, so the comments did not line up. There are some indications in the numerous articles and news entries that I read that this may be a bug in Word 2000. I then used a scheme described by McGhie and others where the TC entry is entered as {TC "ABS@Return the absolute value of a number"} while the first entry when the initial letter changes is coded as {TC "@@BDAYS@Returns the number of business days between two dates"}. After the toc is created, @@ is replaced by a hard return and @ is replaced by a tab. This scheme works tolerably well, but specifying a tab to be 1.0" using Format|Tabs|Set doesn't stick. Usually the tab replacement step results in a dotted leader appearing between the function name and the description as well as between the description and the page number, but resetting the tab with Format|Tabs|Set fixes the toc spacing and the tab and leader between the description and page number is unaffected. Each TC field is on the same page as the function so that Word is able to create the correct page number. The default TOC1 style is used to produce the table of contents. I do not anticipate a great deal of maintenance, so I am considering a completely hand-built toc. Although I am pretty happy with the @ scheme, Pride Goeth Before a Fall, so I would appreciate some analysis and suggestions from the knowledgable contributors to this newsgroup. I have only created a few entries so that not much work will be lost if a superior alternative surfaces. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Custom Fields in Word 2002 (XP) | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Custom page sizes | Page Layout | |||
custom file properties | Microsoft Word Help | |||
How do I force a Word custom property to be Text instead of Number | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Setting custom size problem | Page Layout |