Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can perform a successful mail merge (labels) using Word 2003's mail merge
function against my Microsoft SQL database. I get about 1,000 labels. But when I add a "Skip Record if I_ADDR1 is blank" formula, Word skips addresses in which I_ADDR1 is NOT blank. (It correctly skips records in which I_ADDR1 is actually blank, too.) I tried the same thing with ZIP. When I add the "Skip Record if I_ZIP is blank," it gets rid of about 500 addresses when, in fact, only about 20 of the addresses don't have a ZIP code. Why does Word think that the fields are blank ... and how do overcome this issue? Thanks, in advance. Dan |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi ?B?Y3JpbXNvbmtuZw==?=,
Skip_If is old, old, old and "deprecated". Why not simply filter the records? In the Recipient's dialog box you should be able to select "is blank" from the dropdown list (arrow next to the Addr1 field name). I can perform a successful mail merge (labels) using Word 2003's mail merge function against my Microsoft SQL database. I get about 1,000 labels. But when I add a "Skip Record if I_ADDR1 is blank" formula, Word skips addresses in which I_ADDR1 is NOT blank. (It correctly skips records in which I_ADDR1 is actually blank, too.) I tried the same thing with ZIP. When I add the "Skip Record if I_ZIP is blank," it gets rid of about 500 addresses when, in fact, only about 20 of the addresses don't have a ZIP code. Why does Word think that the fields are blank ... and how do overcome this issue? Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 17 2005) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
I was using the Insert Word Field pull-down list and using the Skip If option. But, yes, I tried the filter instead and that worked perfectly. Thank you. "Cindy M -WordMVP-" wrote: Hi ?B?Y3JpbXNvbmtuZw==?=, Skip_If is old, old, old and "deprecated". Why not simply filter the records? In the Recipient's dialog box you should be able to select "is blank" from the dropdown list (arrow next to the Addr1 field name). I can perform a successful mail merge (labels) using Word 2003's mail merge function against my Microsoft SQL database. I get about 1,000 labels. But when I add a "Skip Record if I_ADDR1 is blank" formula, Word skips addresses in which I_ADDR1 is NOT blank. (It correctly skips records in which I_ADDR1 is actually blank, too.) I tried the same thing with ZIP. When I add the "Skip Record if I_ZIP is blank," it gets rid of about 500 addresses when, in fact, only about 20 of the addresses don't have a ZIP code. Why does Word think that the fields are blank ... and how do overcome this issue? Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 17 2005) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to get all mail merge fields in a document | Mailmerge | |||
Mail merge and blank fields | Mailmerge | |||
mail merge and text form fields | Mailmerge | |||
Empty Mail Merge Fields | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Empty Mail Merge Fields | Microsoft Word Help |