Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to
gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? I have a VB6 app that is currently using an Access 97 MDb to assist in a Word 2003 mailmerge and I wish to phase out Access. I have seen information on creating an .odc file to perform a mailmerge from a SQL Server table or view, but I would prefer to use a stored procedure. Much thanks. |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure
to gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? No, at least not as far as I know. The only way I know how to do this is to use Word VBA OpenDataSource to open a ODBC connection that issues an ODBC call "escape" rather than a SQL SELECT. So for example if you have an ODBC System or user DSN called mydsn that has all the info necessary to connect to your database server and a specific database, and you are using integrated security, you can use ActiveDocument.MailMerge.OpenDataSource _ Name:="", _ Connection:="DSN=mydsn;", _ SQLStatement:="{ call mystoredprocedure }", _ Subtype:=wdMergeSubtypeWord2000 The { call } syntax is one of a number of "ODBC escapes". One problem with this is that Word does not "see" the data in columns that have the Unicode data types in SQL Server when it connects via ODBC. Another possible problem is that you may find that only some procedures work - if so, it's probably multi-step procedures that fail. In Word 2002 and later, you really ought to be able to use a stored procedure via OLE DB, but I have never found any syntax that works in the SQLStatement parameter. In theory, the same ODBC { call } syntax ought to work because it is supported in the OLE DB provider as well, but it does not. Nor do the variants { exec }, or using a Transact-SQL EXECUTE statement. In other words, I don't know how you do it in OLE DB or even if it can be done. It does at least seem to be possible to use the results of Transact-SQL table-valued functions as a merge data source, simply because you can retrieve that table using a standard SELECT statement. But a. I think that type of function only appears in later versions of SQL Server than 2000 b. you would have to wrap every stored procedure you wanted to use in a table-valued function to do it. Personally, I think Microsoft should have fixed this problem years ago, or at least provided some clues on how to use stored procedures as a data source, if it is feasible, but I guess the fact that they haven't problably means that corporates rarely do things this way. -- Peter Jamieson http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk "memead" wrote in message ... Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? I have a VB6 app that is currently using an Access 97 MDb to assist in a Word 2003 mailmerge and I wish to phase out Access. I have seen information on creating an .odc file to perform a mailmerge from a SQL Server table or view, but I would prefer to use a stored procedure. Much thanks. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Much thanks. I was hoping for an easy answer. The only reason that my VB6
application uses mailmerge is to get data into a Word document for easy editing by the users. Crystal Reports does a good job of printing reports, but I need some way of getting the data into Word and opening up the document in Word. Thanks again, Mike "Peter Jamieson" wrote: Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? No, at least not as far as I know. The only way I know how to do this is to use Word VBA OpenDataSource to open a ODBC connection that issues an ODBC call "escape" rather than a SQL SELECT. So for example if you have an ODBC System or user DSN called mydsn that has all the info necessary to connect to your database server and a specific database, and you are using integrated security, you can use ActiveDocument.MailMerge.OpenDataSource _ Name:="", _ Connection:="DSN=mydsn;", _ SQLStatement:="{ call mystoredprocedure }", _ Subtype:=wdMergeSubtypeWord2000 The { call } syntax is one of a number of "ODBC escapes". One problem with this is that Word does not "see" the data in columns that have the Unicode data types in SQL Server when it connects via ODBC. Another possible problem is that you may find that only some procedures work - if so, it's probably multi-step procedures that fail. In Word 2002 and later, you really ought to be able to use a stored procedure via OLE DB, but I have never found any syntax that works in the SQLStatement parameter. In theory, the same ODBC { call } syntax ought to work because it is supported in the OLE DB provider as well, but it does not. Nor do the variants { exec }, or using a Transact-SQL EXECUTE statement. In other words, I don't know how you do it in OLE DB or even if it can be done. It does at least seem to be possible to use the results of Transact-SQL table-valued functions as a merge data source, simply because you can retrieve that table using a standard SELECT statement. But a. I think that type of function only appears in later versions of SQL Server than 2000 b. you would have to wrap every stored procedure you wanted to use in a table-valued function to do it. Personally, I think Microsoft should have fixed this problem years ago, or at least provided some clues on how to use stored procedures as a data source, if it is feasible, but I guess the fact that they haven't problably means that corporates rarely do things this way. -- Peter Jamieson http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk "memead" wrote in message ... Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? I have a VB6 app that is currently using an Access 97 MDb to assist in a Word 2003 mailmerge and I wish to phase out Access. I have seen information on creating an .odc file to perform a mailmerge from a SQL Server table or view, but I would prefer to use a stored procedure. Much thanks. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can use Word VBA and ADO to access SQL Server data directly, but not for
use as a MailMerge data source - in other words, you either have to create your own mailmerge facility, or use VBA to create the mail merge data source that you need, then use that in the merge(s) you want to do (cf. the way you seem to be using Acess as an intermediary at the moment). -- Peter Jamieson http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk "memead" wrote in message ... Much thanks. I was hoping for an easy answer. The only reason that my VB6 application uses mailmerge is to get data into a Word document for easy editing by the users. Crystal Reports does a good job of printing reports, but I need some way of getting the data into Word and opening up the document in Word. Thanks again, Mike "Peter Jamieson" wrote: Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? No, at least not as far as I know. The only way I know how to do this is to use Word VBA OpenDataSource to open a ODBC connection that issues an ODBC call "escape" rather than a SQL SELECT. So for example if you have an ODBC System or user DSN called mydsn that has all the info necessary to connect to your database server and a specific database, and you are using integrated security, you can use ActiveDocument.MailMerge.OpenDataSource _ Name:="", _ Connection:="DSN=mydsn;", _ SQLStatement:="{ call mystoredprocedure }", _ Subtype:=wdMergeSubtypeWord2000 The { call } syntax is one of a number of "ODBC escapes". One problem with this is that Word does not "see" the data in columns that have the Unicode data types in SQL Server when it connects via ODBC. Another possible problem is that you may find that only some procedures work - if so, it's probably multi-step procedures that fail. In Word 2002 and later, you really ought to be able to use a stored procedure via OLE DB, but I have never found any syntax that works in the SQLStatement parameter. In theory, the same ODBC { call } syntax ought to work because it is supported in the OLE DB provider as well, but it does not. Nor do the variants { exec }, or using a Transact-SQL EXECUTE statement. In other words, I don't know how you do it in OLE DB or even if it can be done. It does at least seem to be possible to use the results of Transact-SQL table-valued functions as a merge data source, simply because you can retrieve that table using a standard SELECT statement. But a. I think that type of function only appears in later versions of SQL Server than 2000 b. you would have to wrap every stored procedure you wanted to use in a table-valued function to do it. Personally, I think Microsoft should have fixed this problem years ago, or at least provided some clues on how to use stored procedures as a data source, if it is feasible, but I guess the fact that they haven't problably means that corporates rarely do things this way. -- Peter Jamieson http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk "memead" wrote in message ... Is there any definitive guide on using a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to gather data for a mailmerge on Word 2003? I have a VB6 app that is currently using an Access 97 MDb to assist in a Word 2003 mailmerge and I wish to phase out Access. I have seen information on creating an .odc file to perform a mailmerge from a SQL Server table or view, but I would prefer to use a stored procedure. Much thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Word 2003 MailMerge with SQL Server 2000 problem | Mailmerge | |||
Docs stored on server no longer prompting for "open as read only." | Microsoft Word Help | |||
VB.NET Mailmerge using Stored Procedures | Mailmerge | |||
Merging in Word with a SQL query (Stored Procedure) as the data so | Mailmerge | |||
Tables storing results of Stored Procedure | Tables |