Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Joseph,
I've read the Help file, though not tried the various possibilities. Do you know, off the top of your head, what the comparitive merits in this situation would be of using MERGESEQ, MERGEREC, and LISTNUM? LISTNUM works, but the Help file suggests that the other two would work, also. Any differences I should care about? "Off the top of my head" is a bit vague, but MergeSEQ would be more what you want than MergeRec, as I recall (and understand your question). MergeRec counts the position of the actual record, while MergeSeq counts only the records that are merged, as they merge. If ListNum works correctly for you, then either that or MergeSeq would be fine. I think you have more options to format and calculate using MergeSeq, but that's not an issue, here. Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 8 2004) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Empty Mail Merge Fields | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Empty Mail Merge Fields | Microsoft Word Help | |||
Merge fields in word tables populate by a VBA query | Tables | |||
Using MAILMERGE fields within HYPERLINK fields for Merge to Email | Mailmerge | |||
merge data in a header or text box does not save | Mailmerge |