Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello:
I have a mail merge set up to produce two reports. Report 1 contains a table along the lines of: Student ID Raw Mark Scaled Mark Pass/Fail etc: Report 2 contains a simplified version of the same information: Student ID Pass/Fail which is for distribution to students (ie, stuff they don't need to know has been stripped off it) The data is merged in from an Excel spreadsheet - that aspect words fine. I'm using 'NextRecord' to move through the data records, and the result is exactly what I'm after: a table listing all of the above, with the results dragged in from Excel. To save on time and effort, I would like these 2 reports to be part of the same document, rather than 2 separate docs. However, this would require one of two options: Resetting the mail merge back to the first record, or; Having cells in the second table reflect the contents of relevant cells in the first table. Either would word admirably in theory: but I can't get either of these to work in practice. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Phil Word 2002 XP Home |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the speedy reply Doug;
I think you're right - a macro that copied all the information, then deleted the extra columns would probably work a treat. I would however like to further explore the idea of linking cells in the second table to ones in the first: I see there's a forum for Tables, so I'll see what I can find out there! Thanks again for your help, Phil "Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote: To answer your question, it is not possible to move backwards through the data source. The way that you are doing it now is probably as good as any. I suppose however, you could just take the first document, the more complete one, copy the table and paste it into the document at a second location and then from that new table, delete the columns that you do not need. -- Hope this helps. Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my services on a paid consulting basis. Doug Robbins - Word MVP "Phil in Oz" Phil in wrote in message ... Hello: I have a mail merge set up to produce two reports. Report 1 contains a table along the lines of: Student ID Raw Mark Scaled Mark Pass/Fail etc: Report 2 contains a simplified version of the same information: Student ID Pass/Fail which is for distribution to students (ie, stuff they don't need to know has been stripped off it) The data is merged in from an Excel spreadsheet - that aspect words fine. I'm using 'NextRecord' to move through the data records, and the result is exactly what I'm after: a table listing all of the above, with the results dragged in from Excel. To save on time and effort, I would like these 2 reports to be part of the same document, rather than 2 separate docs. However, this would require one of two options: Resetting the mail merge back to the first record, or; Having cells in the second table reflect the contents of relevant cells in the first table. Either would word admirably in theory: but I can't get either of these to work in practice. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Phil Word 2002 XP Home |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Phil,
You could simply replicate the required mergefields in the second table. That will be a lot easier than trying to link (cross-reference) the cell contents, especially where text is concerned. Cheers -- macropod [MVP - Microsoft Word] ------------------------- "Phil in Oz" wrote in message ... Thanks for the speedy reply Doug; I think you're right - a macro that copied all the information, then deleted the extra columns would probably work a treat. I would however like to further explore the idea of linking cells in the second table to ones in the first: I see there's a forum for Tables, so I'll see what I can find out there! Thanks again for your help, Phil "Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote: To answer your question, it is not possible to move backwards through the data source. The way that you are doing it now is probably as good as any. I suppose however, you could just take the first document, the more complete one, copy the table and paste it into the document at a second location and then from that new table, delete the columns that you do not need. -- Hope this helps. Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my services on a paid consulting basis. Doug Robbins - Word MVP "Phil in Oz" Phil in wrote in message ... Hello: I have a mail merge set up to produce two reports. Report 1 contains a table along the lines of: Student ID Raw Mark Scaled Mark Pass/Fail etc: Report 2 contains a simplified version of the same information: Student ID Pass/Fail which is for distribution to students (ie, stuff they don't need to know has been stripped off it) The data is merged in from an Excel spreadsheet - that aspect words fine. I'm using 'NextRecord' to move through the data records, and the result is exactly what I'm after: a table listing all of the above, with the results dragged in from Excel. To save on time and effort, I would like these 2 reports to be part of the same document, rather than 2 separate docs. However, this would require one of two options: Resetting the mail merge back to the first record, or; Having cells in the second table reflect the contents of relevant cells in the first table. Either would word admirably in theory: but I can't get either of these to work in practice. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Phil Word 2002 XP Home |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not when he is using Next Record fields in the first table in the document.
-- Hope this helps. Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my services on a paid consulting basis. Doug Robbins - Word MVP "macropod" wrote in message ... Hi Phil, You could simply replicate the required mergefields in the second table. That will be a lot easier than trying to link (cross-reference) the cell contents, especially where text is concerned. Cheers -- macropod [MVP - Microsoft Word] ------------------------- "Phil in Oz" wrote in message ... Thanks for the speedy reply Doug; I think you're right - a macro that copied all the information, then deleted the extra columns would probably work a treat. I would however like to further explore the idea of linking cells in the second table to ones in the first: I see there's a forum for Tables, so I'll see what I can find out there! Thanks again for your help, Phil "Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote: To answer your question, it is not possible to move backwards through the data source. The way that you are doing it now is probably as good as any. I suppose however, you could just take the first document, the more complete one, copy the table and paste it into the document at a second location and then from that new table, delete the columns that you do not need. -- Hope this helps. Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my services on a paid consulting basis. Doug Robbins - Word MVP "Phil in Oz" Phil in wrote in message ... Hello: I have a mail merge set up to produce two reports. Report 1 contains a table along the lines of: Student ID Raw Mark Scaled Mark Pass/Fail etc: Report 2 contains a simplified version of the same information: Student ID Pass/Fail which is for distribution to students (ie, stuff they don't need to know has been stripped off it) The data is merged in from an Excel spreadsheet - that aspect words fine. I'm using 'NextRecord' to move through the data records, and the result is exactly what I'm after: a table listing all of the above, with the results dragged in from Excel. To save on time and effort, I would like these 2 reports to be part of the same document, rather than 2 separate docs. However, this would require one of two options: Resetting the mail merge back to the first record, or; Having cells in the second table reflect the contents of relevant cells in the first table. Either would word admirably in theory: but I can't get either of these to work in practice. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Phil Word 2002 XP Home |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how do I set up a repeating information in word doc | Microsoft Word Help | |||
MailMerge Repeating Data | Mailmerge | |||
Repeating text label in mailmerge | Mailmerge | |||
Form Fields Repeating Information | Microsoft Word Help | |||
How do I stop a field from repeating in next record in mailmerge.. | Mailmerge |